25.04.2013 Views

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additional research is necessary to compare more fully the extent and nature of<br />

debate in the many state legislative chambers. The telephone survey conducted<br />

for this report provides only a rough snapshot of each chamber’s practices for<br />

comparison, and in no way can substitute for a documentary review of the transcripts<br />

from each chamber. Still, this survey makes clear that the paucity of<br />

debate in New York’s Legislature – even on significant legislation – stands in stark<br />

contrast with most of the other chambers.<br />

Of course, in most contexts the fact that debate has not occurred in a particular<br />

instance does not necessarily indicate that legislators have inadequately considered<br />

a bill’s merits. In one commentator’s view, “[d]ebate is often irrelevant to<br />

decision and only infrequently wins over votes. Most people’s votes have already<br />

been committed.” 178 In New York State, however, at no point in the legislative<br />

process prior to the floor vote is there any opportunity for members to hear from<br />

each other in an open forum about the policy implications of a specific piece of<br />

legislation. (The four closed legislative party conferences may offer such discussion,<br />

but by definition these meetings do not allow cross-party debate or policy<br />

discussion and are not open to the public.) Accordingly, the absence of public<br />

debate at this late stage is significant as the final lost opportunity for sustained<br />

policy debate to improve a bill.<br />

■■ AMENDMENTS<br />

In both the Assembly and the Senate, sponsors amend bills on occasion after<br />

they have been reported out of a committee. Although such amendments are<br />

customarily announced on the floor of each chamber after they have been made,<br />

they are virtually never voted on or debated on the floor. Not a single one of the<br />

308 major bills analyzed from 1997 through 2001 was amended by the full<br />

chamber on the floor of either the Senate or the Assembly. 179 Moreover, none of<br />

the amendments that were made to those 308 major bills off the floor were<br />

debated on the floor of either chamber. See Fig. 11.<br />

FIGURE 10<br />

<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> LEGISLATURE<br />

■ DEBATE ON MAJOR LEGISLATION 1997-2001<br />

Total Bills Debated Total Bills Debated<br />

Year Total Bills Considered in Assembly in Senate<br />

1997 43 1 (2.3%) 4 (9.3%)<br />

1998 60 4 (6.7%) 4 (6.7%)<br />

1999 72 3 (4.2%) 3 (4.2%)<br />

2000 82 3 (3.7%) 0 (0%)<br />

2001 51 3 (5.9%) 4 (7.8%)<br />

Total 308 14 (4.5%) 15 (4.9%)<br />

<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong>’S <strong>LEGISLATIVE</strong> <strong>PROCESS</strong> 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!