25.04.2013 Views

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■■ REFERRAL OF LEGISLATION TO COMMITTEES<br />

Upon a bill’s introduction in the Assembly or Senate in New York, the Speaker<br />

and Majority Leader, respectively, refer it to a standing committee of their choice<br />

with jurisdiction over the bill’s subject matter. 32 In most of the nation’s 99 state<br />

legislative chambers and in Congress, the legislative leaders play a significant<br />

role in such referrals. In 58 chambers and in Congress, however, the full chamber<br />

can override their leader’s referral, whether by majority vote or by another<br />

mechanism. 33 By contrast, New York’s Speaker and Majority Leader can refer<br />

bills to the committees of their choice without any possibility under the rules of<br />

being overridden. This tool allows the leader of each chamber to refer bills to<br />

committee chairs who he believes will handle bills in accordance with the leader’s<br />

wishes. As discussed below, moreover, New York State’s uniquely large number of<br />

legislative committees, often with overlapping jurisdictions, facilitates the leaders’<br />

use of this tool by providing several committees in a substantive policy area to<br />

which a bill may be properly referred.<br />

■■ COMMITTEE HEARINGS<br />

In most legislatures, committee hearings serve four important purposes. First,<br />

they allow a committee to obtain the testimony of experts in the policy field<br />

at issue that addresses both the precise nature of the problems that require<br />

legislative attention and the wisdom of the specific bill under consideration.<br />

Second, hearings allow members of the public and other witnesses to comment<br />

on both the topic and the bill at hand. Third, through debate between committee<br />

members at the hearing, and media and public reactions to the hearing,<br />

legislators gain both specific ideas to improve the bill under consideration and a<br />

better understanding of the public consensus, or competing views, on the proper<br />

legislative course. Such fact gathering and debate are critical to shape and draft<br />

legislation, to determine legislative priorities, and to understand the intended and<br />

unintended consequences of a proposed bill. Fourth, hearings provide the chief<br />

mechanism for a legislature to oversee the administrative agencies for which it is<br />

responsible under the law. 34<br />

Twelve of the 99 state legislative chambers require committees to hold hearings<br />

on every bill referred to them. In 13 more, committees must hold a hearing on a<br />

bill if requested by the sponsor or, in some states, by any legislator. 35 One student<br />

of Congressional procedure has suggested that “[h]olding hearings is perhaps<br />

Congress’ single most extensive activity.” 36<br />

In New York, however, a committee hearing devoted to a specific piece of legislation<br />

is all but unheard of. In the Senate, out of the 152 pieces of major legislation<br />

that were ultimately passed into law from 1997 through 2001 for which complete<br />

data were available, only one bill was the subject of a hearing devoted<br />

specifically to its consideration (i.e., 0.7%). 37 The Senate Majority Leader sponsored<br />

that bill. 38 Moreover, in only eight cases (i.e., 5.3%) were hearings held to<br />

<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong>’S <strong>LEGISLATIVE</strong> <strong>PROCESS</strong> 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!