25.04.2013 Views

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

■ Accessibility. An accessible legislature guarantees members of the public –<br />

like their legislators – meaningful opportunities to review and comment upon<br />

legislation prior to its final passage, transparent legislative procedures, open<br />

meetings, and accurate and complete records of governmental proceedings.<br />

Constituents can obtain information about their representatives’ views and<br />

actions, and about the legislative process itself, and can make their views<br />

known to their representatives before final decisions are made.<br />

■ Accountability. An accountable legislature encourages members to take responsibility<br />

for the content of legislation and facilitates voters in their efforts to judge<br />

their representatives for the legislation they pass or fail to pass. To this end, legislators<br />

are given a meaningful role in the development of legislation and can<br />

vote their conscience in committee or on the floor. Lawmakers personally consider<br />

and vote on bills, rather than delegating this responsibility to another or<br />

voting by proxy. Accurate information about legislators’ roles in the lawmaking<br />

process, their committee attendance and votes, and their attendance and votes<br />

on the floor, is readily available to voters in a timely manner. Without both<br />

legislators’ meaningful participation in the legislative process and publicly<br />

available information about the same, voters cannot honestly and effectively<br />

hold their representatives accountable for the actions of the legislature.<br />

■ Efficiency. An efficient legislature produces legislation for the governor’s signature<br />

without unnecessary delays, unduly high ratios of bills introduced to<br />

bills passed, or unnecessary barriers to final passage of a single bill by both<br />

chambers. The financial costs of the legislative process are no greater than<br />

necessary to accomplish the goals outlined already; staff and other legislative<br />

resources are directed where they are most effectively used. A well-functioning<br />

legislative process may not be cheap, but it need not be inefficient in its<br />

use of resources.<br />

In addition to these critical values, a functional legislature provides sufficient evidence<br />

of legislative intent – through committee reports, floor statements, hearing<br />

records, and other documented legislative history – to allow courts and administrative<br />

agencies to interpret and enforce the laws of the jurisdiction accurately<br />

and justly.<br />

This report concludes that New York’s current legislative process deprives the<br />

people of the representativeness, deliberativeness, accessibility, accountability,<br />

and efficiency that they deserve, and that are provided to a greater extent by all<br />

other legislatures in the United States. With respect to representation, the current<br />

system effectively shuts the people’s elected representatives out of the policymaking<br />

process, and often prevents important legislation that enjoys majority support<br />

from reaching the floor of the Senate or Assembly. The Legislature’s deliberativeness<br />

is undermined by: a moribund committee system that does not function<br />

effectively, voting procedures that allow bills to be passed into law without<br />

adequate review, and a dysfunctional reconciliation process. The current system<br />

INTRODUCTION 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!