30.04.2013 Views

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POST-REFORMATION CULMINATION.<br />

outweigh the negative testimony of those who have not, and<br />

he finally decides that the salt statue is still in being.<br />

No doubt a work like this produced a considerable effect<br />

in Protestant countries; indeed, this effect seems evident as<br />

tar off as England, for, in 1720, we find in Dean Prideaux's<br />

Old and New Testament connected a map on which the statue<br />

of salt is carefully indicated. So, too, in Holland, in the<br />

Sacred Geography '^^x\i\\^\\Q^ at Utrecht in 1758 by the theologian<br />

Bachiene, we find him, while showing many signs of<br />

rationalism,<br />

existence of<br />

evidently inclined to the old<br />

the salt pillar; but just here<br />

views as to the<br />

comes a curious<br />

evidence of the real direction of the current of thought<br />

through the century, for, nine years later, in the German<br />

translation of Bachiene's work we find copious notes by the<br />

translator in a far more rationalistic spirit ; indeed, we see<br />

the dawn of the inevitable day of compromise, for we now<br />

have, instead of the old argument that the divine power by<br />

one miraculous act changed Lot's wife into a salt pillar, the<br />

^^ suggestion that she was caught in a shower of sulphur and<br />

saltpetre, covered by it, and that the result was a lump,<br />

which in a general way is called in our sacred books " a<br />

pillar of<br />

*<br />

salt."<br />

But, from the middle of the eighteenth century, the new<br />

current sets through Christendom with ever-increasing<br />

strength. Very interesting is it to compare the great scriptural<br />

commentaries of the middle of this century with those<br />

published a century earlier.<br />

Of the earlier ones we may take Matthew Poole's Synopsis<br />

as a type: as authorized by royal decree in 1667 it con-<br />

tains very substantial arguments for the pious belief in the<br />

statue. Of the later ones we may take the edition of the<br />

noted commentary of the Jesuit Tirinus seventy years later:<br />

while he feels bound to present the authorities, he evidently<br />

endeavours to get rid of the subject as speedily as possible<br />

245<br />

* For Briemle, see his Anddchtige Pilgerfahrt, p. 129. For Masius, see his<br />

De Uxore Lothi in Statuam Salis conversa, Hafnise, 1720, especially pp. 29-31.<br />

For Dean Prideaux, see his Old and N'ew Testament connected in the History<br />

of the Jews, 1720, map at page 7. For Bachiene, see his Historische und geographische<br />

Beschreibung von Palcestina, Leipzig, 1766, vol. i, pp. 11 8-1 20, and<br />

notes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!