30.04.2013 Views

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

Volume - The Clarence Darrow Collection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THEOLOGICAL EFFORTS AT COMPROMISE.<br />

257<br />

Principal Dawson has ventured the explanation that a flood<br />

of salt mud coming from a volcano incrusted her.<br />

But theologians themselves were the first to show the<br />

inadequacy of these explanations. <strong>The</strong> more rationalistic<br />

pointed out the fact that they were contrary to the sacred<br />

text : Von Bohlen, an eminent professor at Konigsberg, in<br />

his sturdy German honesty, declared that the salt pillar<br />

gave rise to the story, and compared the pillar of salt<br />

causing this transformation legend to the rock in Greek<br />

mythology which gave rise to the transformation legend<br />

of Niobe.<br />

On the other hand, the more severely orthodox protested<br />

against such attempts to explain away the clear statements<br />

of Holy Writ. Dom Calmet, while presenting many of<br />

these explanations made as early as his time, gives<br />

us to<br />

understand that nearly all theologians adhered to the idea<br />

that Lot's wife was instantly and really changed into salt ;<br />

and in our own time, as we shall presently see, have come<br />

some very vigorous protests.<br />

Similar attempts were made to explain the other ancient<br />

legends regarding<br />

the Dead Sea. One of the most recent<br />

of these is that the cities of the plain, having been built with<br />

blocks of bituminous rock, were set on fire by lightning, a<br />

contemporary earthquake helping on the work. Still an-<br />

other is that accumulations of petroleum and inflammable<br />

gas escaped through a fissure, took fire, and so produced<br />

the catastrophe.*<br />

<strong>The</strong> revolt against such efforts to reconcile scientific fact<br />

with myth and legend had become very evident about the<br />

middle of the nineteenth century. In 185 1 and 1852 Van de<br />

Velde made his journey. He was a most devout man,<br />

but he confessed that the volcanic action at the Dead Sea<br />

must have been far earlier than the catastrophe mentioned<br />

in our sacred books, and that " the overthrow of Sodom and<br />

* For Kranzel, see his Reise nach Jerusalem, etc. For Schegg, see his Gedenk-<br />

buch einer Pilger reise, etc., 1867, chap. xxiv. For Palmer, see his Desert of the<br />

Exodus, vol. ii, pp. 478, 479. For the various compromises, see works already<br />

cited, passim. For Von Bohlen, see his Genesis, Konigsberg, 1835, pp. 200-213.<br />

For Calmet, see his Dictionarium, etc., Venet., 1766. For very recent compromises,<br />

see J. W. Dawson and Dr. Cunningham Geikie in works cited.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!