- Page 1: Devouring Profit the socio-economic
- Page 5 and 6: 4 6 9 11 19 31 42 51 64 72 78 84 96
- Page 7: Gleaning, the term for cultural con
- Page 10: 10 Some of the recommendations of t
- Page 13 and 14: Colombia: “Authorities from the p
- Page 15 and 16: are not used to making measurements
- Page 17 and 18: Advantages of Bb: environmentally s
- Page 19 and 20: I believe that a man who has spent
- Page 21 and 22: 2.1 India In India two main regions
- Page 23 and 24: 2.2 Ecuador An RRA was carried out
- Page 25 and 26: case reduction for quality is small
- Page 27 and 28: nity are not paying enough attentio
- Page 29 and 30: Table 12. Main problems in coffee p
- Page 31 and 32: “Agricultural production has evol
- Page 33 and 34: Picking of the infested berries and
- Page 35 and 36: Table 15. Harvesting periods of som
- Page 37 and 38: which is in fact the cheapest compo
- Page 39 and 40: enefit seen as a consequence of the
- Page 41 and 42: But we have to consider also that t
- Page 43 and 44: CBB is a complex pest because it ca
- Page 45 and 46: 4.2 Estimation of a loss function f
- Page 47 and 48: During the field visits many farmer
- Page 49: 4.4 Cost structure for CBB manageme
- Page 52 and 53:
52 The previous chapter dealt with
- Page 54 and 55:
54 On average the share of CBB mana
- Page 56 and 57:
56 5.3 Economics of CBB in Guatemal
- Page 58 and 59:
58 5.4 Economics of CBB in Mexico U
- Page 60 and 61:
60 For the same percentage of CBB t
- Page 62 and 63:
62 Because of these factors it can
- Page 64 and 65:
64 Pest control needs to be viewed
- Page 66 and 67:
66 Because of inadequate training,
- Page 68 and 69:
68 6.5 Rural wages Since CBB contro
- Page 70 and 71:
70 many other coffee countries. The
- Page 72 and 73:
72 Quality of the product, quality
- Page 74 and 75:
74 face of world coffee and to form
- Page 76 and 77:
76 A more complete socio-economic
- Page 79 and 80:
ANECAFÉ. 1999. Proyecto manejo int
- Page 81 and 82:
GARCÍA, A. 1998. Diagnóstico Inic
- Page 83:
UPTON, M. 1996. The Economics of Tr
- Page 86 and 87:
86 Table 31. Area and share of the
- Page 88 and 89:
88 Ecuadorian coffee growers Main c
- Page 90 and 91:
90 Colombia or Honduras for instanc
- Page 92 and 93:
92 As can be observed, 60% of farme
- Page 94 and 95:
94 Analysing Figure 20, we see that
- Page 97 and 98:
This appendix reviews the economic
- Page 99 and 100:
export about 20,000 tonnes (somethi
- Page 101 and 102:
national economy of Honduras. Betwe
- Page 103 and 104:
1985 and 1992 the national coffee p
- Page 105 and 106:
estimated at 6%. Colombia’s princ