30.04.2013 Views

Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization

Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization

Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52<br />

The previous chapter dealt with the losses due to CBB damage. We now draw on<br />

studies to look further at the implications of the pest in different countries. Data on<br />

coffee farmers in each country can be found in Appendix A; data on coffee in these<br />

countries in Appendix B.<br />

5.1 Economics of<br />

CBB in India<br />

5.1.1 Losses due to CBB<br />

Figure 6 simulates income reduction in Rupees per hectare due to different levels of<br />

CBB damage. As can be seen, reductions will depend on the expected yield. E.g. for<br />

a yield of 1,200 kg of green coffee/ha losses will be approximately Rs 7,000 for 20%<br />

damage, equivalent to US$155, which is a serious loss.<br />

Income/ha (Rupees)<br />

35000<br />

33000<br />

31000<br />

29000<br />

27000<br />

1,200 kg/ha<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

% of CBB<br />

900 kg/ha<br />

Figure 6. Income reduction per hectare due to CBB damage rates.<br />

5.1.2 Cost of controlling CBB<br />

Although it is always difficult to establish a standard cost of CBB management, in the<br />

survey with extensionists at Kalpetta we tried to estimate it. They reckoned the average<br />

cost per hectare at about Rs 2,800 but with a skewed distribution (Figure 7).<br />

So if we assume that the CBB management cost is about Rs 2,500 with potential<br />

losses of around Rs 7,000 if damage rises to 20%, it is quite <strong>profit</strong>able to carry out the<br />

pest control. In a subsequent study carried out by the <strong>Coffee</strong> Board (Setti et al., 2001)<br />

and analysed by Duque (2002), the real costs of CBB management tend to be lower<br />

than those calculated by the extensionists (Figure 8). It is likely that the declining<br />

coffee prices between the two studies had caused farmers to reduce costs further and<br />

that this to some extent explains the discrepancy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!