Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization
Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization
Devouring profit - International Coffee Organization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56<br />
5.3 Economics of<br />
CBB in Guatemala<br />
Several experiments and studies about economic aspects of CBB have been developed<br />
in Guatemala, e.g. Decazy (1989), Ochoa et al. (1989), Zelaya et al. (1989),<br />
demonstrating that this problem has received considerable attention there.<br />
5.3.1 Losses due to CBB<br />
Ochoa et al. (1989) found that losses in weight increased proportionally as infestation<br />
level rose. They estimated losses at two different altitudes, the first at 457 m above<br />
level sea and the second at 762 m. The average function over 3 harvests for the<br />
higher altitude was as follows:<br />
Where:<br />
Y= % of total losses in the harvest (including all parchment coffee qualities, by weight)<br />
X= % of beans perforated by CBB<br />
If we take the case of Santa Isabel, a large Guatemalan coffee estate as an example,<br />
according to Mr. Bartolo Lacan the manager, the average productivity for the last three<br />
years would be around 45 quintals (qq) of parchment coffee / ha.<br />
For this productivity we can simulate potential losses due to different levels of CBB in<br />
coffee fields following Ochoa’s function assuming a price of US$42/qq of parchment<br />
coffee.<br />
Figure 11 shows the losses per manzana (0.7 ha) and the cost of the cultural control,<br />
assuming this is constant at 136 Quetzals/manzana (US$17 at 1999 farm prices). Because<br />
we know losses for different levels of CBB, a loss function can be estimated in<br />
this case, which is as follows.<br />
Where:<br />
Y =<br />
6.46 .<br />
Y= Loss in US$ per manzana<br />
X= % of beans perforated by CBB<br />
So we have now two functions. On the one hand the loss function as estimated and<br />
X