05.05.2013 Views

Silica (crystalline, respirable) - OEHHA

Silica (crystalline, respirable) - OEHHA

Silica (crystalline, respirable) - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINAL February 2005<br />

primarily in the 0.5 – 5 µm range, with a collection efficiency profile intended to match the<br />

penetration of particles into the alveolar region of the human lung. In the case of the South<br />

African gold mine studies (Beadle, 1971; Page-Shipp and Harris, 1972; Hnizdo and Sluis-<br />

Cremer, 1993), particle number was determined by an optical method selecting <strong>respirable</strong><br />

particles (range of 0.5 to 5 µm). Thus, the risk estimates obtained from these studies refer to<br />

particles in the size range where penetration occurs into the respiratory region of the lung. This<br />

corresponds to the size range of particles thought to be responsible for silicosis. It differs from<br />

the definition of “<strong>respirable</strong>” particles (i.e. PM10) commonly used in environmental<br />

measurements, which refers to particles capable of penetrating anywhere in the lower respiratory<br />

tract (described as “thoracic” particles in occupational studies).<br />

Risk estimation for silicosis from epidemiologic studies<br />

The data from the above studies have been used by a number of investigators (Finkelstein, 2000;<br />

Chen et al., 2001; Hughes, 1995) and by <strong>OEHHA</strong> staff to estimate percent silicosis based on<br />

cumulative silica exposure in units of (mg/m 3 )-yr. The results are summarized in Table 15.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!