(70) Therefore, the risk of sulphuric acid dew point attack ... - DTI Home

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.3 Utility Scale Market – Published Information 5.3.1 Source of Market Information McCoy’s data was gathered through a written survey of US and non-US suppliers of electric power generating equipment and engineering services. As data from each power plant are cross-checked from various sources, it is believed that McCoy provides the most complete and accurate information from an independent organisation. The calculations are based on the steam turbine MWe output in combined cycle applications and half the gas turbine output in cogeneration, (non combined cycle) projects. The final figure generated for total installed electrical capacity is therefore somewhat conservative by this method, however, the data provides an excellent indication of trends within the market (Section 5.3.2) and major market players (Section 5.3.3). 5.3.2 The HRSG Buyers In terms of geographical distribution, it is apparent that over the past ten years (1992-2001), the biggest buyers by far of HRSGs have been in the US. A massive 48% of all world-wide purchases have been made by operators in the US. Next to the US the United Kingdom and Japan are the joint closest in terms of purchases over this period, however, at just 4% of the total ten year sales the sheer size and domination of the US market is obviously apparent. In terms of customer type three categories emerge. These are classed as: • Non-Utility Generators (NUGs) • Electricity Utility Power Generators (EUPGs) • Industrial Power Generators (IPGs). The NUGs account for some 81% of orders over the past ten years in the US market and some 49% of orders for the rest of the world. Over the same ten year period, EUPGs account for some 17% of the orders in the US alone and some 44% of the non-US market. 5.3.3 The HRSG Manufacturers With respect to the outlined ten year period, the key manufacturers on an individual company basis were identified as Alstom Power (14.2%), Nooter/Eriksen (12.6%), Deltak (9.5%), NEM (7.7%) and Aalborg Industries (7.5%). Companies outside this top five, in the 1-7% share of the market included Foster Wheeler Energy (6.4%), Mitsubushi Heavy Industries (4.3%), Doosan Heavy industries (4.0%) and Mitsui Babcock Energy Limited (1%). Below the 1% threshold, some 50 companies, partnerships or joint ventures compete for the remaining market share. It is worth noting that many companies are involved in various types of commercial agreements with related companies throughout the world, therefore if all related companies, joint projects and licensee relationships are (100)
considered the top ranking is altered with NEM taking first place followed by Nooter/Eriksen and then Alstom Power. 5.4 Conclusions • Over the past ten years (1992-2001), the biggest buyers by far of utility scale HRSGs have been in the USA, with 48% of all world-wide purchases. Next are the United Kingdom and Japan with 4% of the total sales. • Key manufacturers in the above period were Alstom Power (14.2%), Nooter/Eriksen (12.6%), Deltak (9.5%), NEM (7.7%) and Aalborg Industries (7.5%). Companies outside this top five in the 1-7% share of the market included Foster Wheeler Energy (6.4%), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (4.3%), Doosan Heavy industries (4.0%) and Mitsui Babcock Energy Limited (1%). • For industrial scale HRSGs, there were around 33% of sales in each of the USA and Europe, with the other leading market being Asia and Australasia (excluding China) with 19%. (101)
Page 1 and 2: Therefore, the risk of sulphuric ac
Page 3 and 4: components in terms of thermal fati
Page 5 and 6: 3.8.2 Operating Costs Fixed operati
Page 7 and 8: and bio-gas from anaerobic digestio
Page 9 and 10: 4 NEW AND DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGIES 4
Page 11 and 12: many existing combined cycle gas tu
Page 13 and 14: 4.3 Improvements to Cycle and Other
Page 15 and 16: The world’s first operational ste
Page 17 and 18: application for which OTSGs may be
Page 19 and 20: 4.3.6 Supercritical Technology Curr
Page 21 and 22: Initially, the coal is pulverised i
Page 23 and 24: Figure 33: Diagram of a typical IGC
Page 25 and 26: Plant Country Start Fuel Process MW
Page 27 and 28: • The use of HRSGs within IGCC pl
Page 29: Company Alstom Aprovis Erie Innovat
Page 33 and 34: Figure 34: Average percentage of bu
Page 35 and 36: European (CEE) countries. The marke
Page 37 and 38: 6.4.1.2 Fluctuations in the Price o
Page 39 and 40: consents policy had the effect of c
Page 41 and 42: equipment, increasing the opportuni
Page 43 and 44: 6.5.1 Possible Non-Technical Barrie
Page 45 and 46: Detailed studies of CCTs within the
Page 47 and 48: knowledge, expertise and experience
Page 49 and 50: Up until the mid 1990’s and opera
Page 51 and 52: Company Ultimate Parent Company BIB

(70) Therefore, the risk of sulphuric acid dew point attack ... - DTI Home

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?