05.06.2013 Views

Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...

Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...

Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OR/11/013<br />

Table 4.4 Compounds with a possible risk but no usage data up to 2006<br />

Compound Year Leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hazard score<br />

Pyrosulam 2007 4<br />

Am<strong>in</strong>opyralid 2005 4<br />

Flazasulphuron 1989 3<br />

4.3.3 Corroborat<strong>in</strong>g evidence for assessment<br />

Worrall et al. (2000) used a list of 43 pesticides which had been reported <strong>in</strong> UK <strong>groundwater</strong><br />

up to 1993 to assess which were likely to be leachers. Of these, 12 appear <strong>in</strong> Table 4.3:<br />

bentazone, chlorpyrifos, clopyralid, dicamba, ethofumasate, l<strong>in</strong>uron, oxamyl, pendimethal<strong>in</strong>,<br />

phenmedipham, propyzamide, triallate and triclopyr. Many other compounds <strong>in</strong> this survey<br />

are no longer used <strong>in</strong> the UK, e.g. atraz<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Gooddy et al. (2005) detected 23 pesticides <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundwater</strong> <strong>in</strong> south Yorkshire. Of these, 11<br />

compounds appear <strong>in</strong> Table 4.3 and 9 compounds are no longer licensed. Three of the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>der were assessed as leachers by this method, but excluded due to <strong>in</strong>sufficient national<br />

usage. Methiocarb was assessed as a non-leacher.<br />

4.4 PESTICIDE METABOLITES<br />

A separate assessment of pesticide metabolites needs to be made, as the physicochemical<br />

properties, persistence and toxicity of these compounds may be very different from those of<br />

their parent compounds. They may also be present at concentrations similar to or even<br />

exceed<strong>in</strong>g the parent compound (Box 3).<br />

4.4.1 Exist<strong>in</strong>g UK assessments<br />

S<strong>in</strong>clair et al. (2010) reported measured concentrations <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundwater</strong> of the UK from the<br />

Environment Agency and water companies for a range of compounds. The metabolites<br />

detected were all from compounds no longer licensed <strong>in</strong> the UK (DDT and heptachlor) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded op-DDE, pp-DDE, deethylatraz<strong>in</strong>e, deisopropylatraz<strong>in</strong>e, cis-heptachlor epoxide,<br />

trans-heptachlor epoxide, op-TDE and pp-TDE.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>clair et al. (2010) then selected 53 pesticide metabolites from a total of 485 from UK<br />

pesticides with available <strong>in</strong>formation for a desk study of metabolite impact on UK dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water based on their potential to contam<strong>in</strong>ate water (Table A1.1, Appendix 1). This<br />

assessment <strong>in</strong>corporated parent compound usage, formation rates <strong>in</strong> soil, persistence and<br />

mobility and estimated toxicity and/or potential to exhibit pesticidal activity. The study<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded compounds currently licensed and those which have recently lost approval, e.g.<br />

aldicarb, atraz<strong>in</strong>e and isoproturon. About half of the compounds had been identified dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environmental degradation as well as <strong>in</strong> mammalian toxicity test<strong>in</strong>g of the parent. The study<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded the estimated efficiency of removal dur<strong>in</strong>g dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment as well as<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g environmental degradation. The maximum predicted concentration <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ished water<br />

was for metazachlor sulfonic acid which is not considered to have pesticidal properties.<br />

For five of the metabolites significant concentrations <strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water were predicted by<br />

their model. These were aldicarb sulphone (aldicarb metabolite), 3-carbamyl-1,2,4,5tetrachlorobenzoic<br />

acid (chlorothalonil metabolite), cyanaz<strong>in</strong>e chloroacid (cyanaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

metabolite), desisopropyl atraz<strong>in</strong>e and methomyl (thiodicarb metabolite and also parent<br />

compound).<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!