Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...
Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...
Emerging contaminants in groundwater - NERC Open Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OR/11/013<br />
Figure 5.13 Numbers of detections of polar persistent pollutants <strong>in</strong> European <strong>groundwater</strong><br />
exceed<strong>in</strong>g the 0.1µg/L pesticide limit (from Loos et al. 2010) ........................ 46<br />
Figure 5.14 Numbers of detections of polar persistent pollutants <strong>in</strong> European <strong>groundwater</strong><br />
exceed<strong>in</strong>g a concentration of 10 ng/L (from Loos et al. 2010) ........................ 46<br />
Figure 5.15 Distribution of <strong>groundwater</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g for perfluor<strong>in</strong>ated chemicals, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
maximum total of detected perfluor<strong>in</strong>ated compounds (PFXmax) per site<br />
(Environment Agency, 2008a) ......................................................................... 47<br />
Figure 5.16 Distribution of pharmaceuticals <strong>in</strong> <strong>groundwater</strong> with depth below sewer.<br />
Concentrations given <strong>in</strong> the key are average values recorded <strong>in</strong> raw sewage<br />
effluent with<strong>in</strong> the overly<strong>in</strong>g trunk sewer (after Ellis et al., 2006) .................. 48<br />
Figure 5.17 Microorganics <strong>in</strong> septage and <strong>groundwater</strong> , Cape Cod (Swartz et al. 2006) . 49<br />
Figure 5.18 Structure of carbamazep<strong>in</strong>e .............................................................................. 52<br />
Figure 6.1 Pathways <strong>in</strong>to the environment for veter<strong>in</strong>ary medic<strong>in</strong>es (after Boxall et al.<br />
2003) ................................................................................................................. 54<br />
Figure 7.1 The top 30 most frequently detected compounds <strong>in</strong> the Environment Agency<br />
<strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database (exclud<strong>in</strong>g sulphur) ................. 56<br />
Figure 7.2 The top 30 compounds selected by maximum concentration <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Environment Agency <strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database .............. 56<br />
Figure 7.3 Distribution of mean concentrations of atraz<strong>in</strong>e and its metabolites <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Environment Agency <strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database .............. 57<br />
Figure 7.4 Distribution of mean concentrations of chloroform <strong>in</strong> the Environment Agency<br />
<strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database ................................................. 58<br />
Figure 7.5 Distribution of mean concentrations of fluoranthene <strong>in</strong> the Environment<br />
Agency <strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database .................................... 59<br />
Figure 7.6 Distribution of mean concentrations of ethyl benzene <strong>in</strong> the Environment<br />
Agency <strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database .................................... 60<br />
Figure 7.7 Distribution of mean concentrations of caffe<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the Environment Agency<br />
<strong>groundwater</strong> organic micropollutant database ................................................. 61<br />
Figure 7.8 Hotspot of DEET detections <strong>in</strong> the Shrewsbury area ....................................... 64<br />
Figure 7.9 Hotspot of bisphenol A detections <strong>in</strong> the Waveney catchment, East Anglia ... 64<br />
Figure 7.10 Hotspots of caffe<strong>in</strong>e detections <strong>in</strong> north London and the Lea Valley .............. 65<br />
Figure 7.11 Hotspots of paraben detections <strong>in</strong> Hampshire .................................................. 65<br />
TABLES<br />
Table 4.1 Processes controll<strong>in</strong>g pesticide mobility and persistence ................................ 14<br />
Table 4.2 Leach<strong>in</strong>g hazard tests us<strong>in</strong>g pesticide properties ............................................. 16<br />
Table 4.3 Results of leach<strong>in</strong>g hazard tests us<strong>in</strong>g the criteria shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4.2.<br />
Compounds denoted with * are shown on the database as hav<strong>in</strong>g a high aff<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
to particles. Compounds denoted <strong>in</strong> bold have Kow less than or equal to that of<br />
metaldehyde (0.12). .......................................................................................... 18<br />
v