The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
100 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [July,<br />
rear half of the crown-sheet one part turned up, and the remaining portion turned down<br />
to the side of the fire-box. <strong>The</strong>re was no indication of low water. <strong>The</strong> safety-valve<br />
was so w y edged into the debris that we could not get at it for examination. Engineer<br />
Weimer stated that there was plenty of water in the boiler, and that the steam-gauge<br />
indicated 80 pounds.<br />
It will be seen from Fig. 2 that flat Z-braces were used on the crown-sheet. This<br />
form of brace is inherently weak, and should never be used for such purposes. <strong>The</strong><br />
solid crow-foot brace is superior to it in every way. In Fig. 4 we present two views of<br />
the Z-brace, which will illustrate the cause of its weakness. <strong>The</strong> left-hand view shows<br />
the brace as first put in, while the right-hand view shows what happens to the brace<br />
when a pull comes on it. <strong>The</strong> ends are drawn away from the sheets, and the brace<br />
straightens out and allows the crown-sheet to bulge outwards. In most cases this de-<br />
flection of the crown-sheet will not be sufficient to cause an immediate fracture; but as<br />
the pressure in the boiler varies the brace will bend back and forth, and in the course of<br />
time it is almost certain to crystallize and fracture across the line of greatest bending.<br />
This action is well illustrated by the common process of breaking a wire by repeatedly<br />
bending it back and forth with the hands. <strong>The</strong> action in the case of the Z-brace is<br />
precisely the same, and that is why we say that this form of brace is inherently weak.<br />
Inspectors' Report.<br />
May, 1894.<br />
During this month our inspectors made 8,142 inspection trips, visited 15,966 boilers,<br />
inspected 6,893 both internally and externally, and subjected 735 to hydrostatic press-<br />
ure. <strong>The</strong> whole number of defects reported reached 11,613, of which 1,123 were considered<br />
dangerous; 35 boilers were regarded unsafe for f-irther use. Our usual summary<br />
is given below<br />
:<br />
Nature of Defects.<br />
Cases of deposit of sediment, -<br />
Cases of incrustation and scale<br />
Cases of internal grooving, -<br />
...<br />
Cases of internal corrosion, -<br />
-----<br />
Cases of external corrosion, -<br />
Broken and loose braces and stays, -<br />
Settings defective,<br />
Furnaces out of shape,<br />
Fractured plates, -<br />
Burned plates, -<br />
Blistered plates, -<br />
-<br />
-<br />
- - ...<br />
Cases of defective riveting, - - - -<br />
Defective heads,<br />
Serious leakage around tube ends, -<br />
-<br />
...<br />
-----<br />
Serious leakage at seams, -<br />
Defective water-gauges,<br />
Defective blow-offs,<br />
Cases of deficiency of water, - - - -<br />
Safety-valves overloaded, -<br />
Whole Number.