08.06.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [July,<br />

rear half of the crown-sheet one part turned up, and the remaining portion turned down<br />

to the side of the fire-box. <strong>The</strong>re was no indication of low water. <strong>The</strong> safety-valve<br />

was so w y edged into the debris that we could not get at it for examination. Engineer<br />

Weimer stated that there was plenty of water in the boiler, and that the steam-gauge<br />

indicated 80 pounds.<br />

It will be seen from Fig. 2 that flat Z-braces were used on the crown-sheet. This<br />

form of brace is inherently weak, and should never be used for such purposes. <strong>The</strong><br />

solid crow-foot brace is superior to it in every way. In Fig. 4 we present two views of<br />

the Z-brace, which will illustrate the cause of its weakness. <strong>The</strong> left-hand view shows<br />

the brace as first put in, while the right-hand view shows what happens to the brace<br />

when a pull comes on it. <strong>The</strong> ends are drawn away from the sheets, and the brace<br />

straightens out and allows the crown-sheet to bulge outwards. In most cases this de-<br />

flection of the crown-sheet will not be sufficient to cause an immediate fracture; but as<br />

the pressure in the boiler varies the brace will bend back and forth, and in the course of<br />

time it is almost certain to crystallize and fracture across the line of greatest bending.<br />

This action is well illustrated by the common process of breaking a wire by repeatedly<br />

bending it back and forth with the hands. <strong>The</strong> action in the case of the Z-brace is<br />

precisely the same, and that is why we say that this form of brace is inherently weak.<br />

Inspectors' Report.<br />

May, 1894.<br />

During this month our inspectors made 8,142 inspection trips, visited 15,966 boilers,<br />

inspected 6,893 both internally and externally, and subjected 735 to hydrostatic press-<br />

ure. <strong>The</strong> whole number of defects reported reached 11,613, of which 1,123 were considered<br />

dangerous; 35 boilers were regarded unsafe for f-irther use. Our usual summary<br />

is given below<br />

:<br />

Nature of Defects.<br />

Cases of deposit of sediment, -<br />

Cases of incrustation and scale<br />

Cases of internal grooving, -<br />

...<br />

Cases of internal corrosion, -<br />

-----<br />

Cases of external corrosion, -<br />

Broken and loose braces and stays, -<br />

Settings defective,<br />

Furnaces out of shape,<br />

Fractured plates, -<br />

Burned plates, -<br />

Blistered plates, -<br />

-<br />

-<br />

- - ...<br />

Cases of defective riveting, - - - -<br />

Defective heads,<br />

Serious leakage around tube ends, -<br />

-<br />

...<br />

-----<br />

Serious leakage at seams, -<br />

Defective water-gauges,<br />

Defective blow-offs,<br />

Cases of deficiency of water, - - - -<br />

Safety-valves overloaded, -<br />

Whole Number.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!