08.06.2013 Views

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [May,<br />

laugh. Two men went into the boiler to release him, but their combined efforts only<br />

brought shrieks of pain from the unfortunate. Some one telephoned to Dr. Mandeville<br />

Thuiu. A machinist was also sent for, and both arrived about the same time. All sorts<br />

of schemes were concocted by the physician, the machinist, and the now thoroughly<br />

frightened workmen. To cut through the boiler would take several hours, so that had<br />

to be given up as impracticable. With the most pitiful groans Parker insisted that the<br />

flue pipes were slowly closing in on him and squeezing out his breath. Dr. Thum hit<br />

upon a plan. He sent the machinist into the boiler with a knife. By tearing and cut-<br />

ting the machinist succeeded in removing most of Parker's clothing. A box of axle<br />

grease was then brought into use, and Parker's body was thoroughly greased where the<br />

pipes did not hold it. A rope was then tied just below his shoulders. All the men<br />

outside then caught the end of the rope and pulled. <strong>The</strong> hips appeared to be the principal<br />

place of resistance. A shriek came from Parker as the rope began to tighten, and<br />

then his body suddenly shot forward. All of his clothes were left behind and the man<br />

was pulled out of his prison as naked as the day he was born, his whole body glistening<br />

with grease. Parker's hips and one leg were a mass of bruises, and he had to be carried<br />

to his home in a neighboring alley. It will be two weeks before he is able to work<br />

again.— Louisville Courier-Journal.<br />

A Boiler that Needed Repairs.<br />

Once upon a time there was a man who had a knife. <strong>The</strong> blades of the knife, one<br />

by one, got so badly nicked and otherwise injured that new blades were substituted for<br />

them as occasion required. Finally the handle went to pieces, and a new one was provided.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question was then discussed at the grocery store whether this was the same<br />

old original knife or not. Some of the Solons of the village held that as it contained<br />

no portion of the original knife, it must be a different one. Others held that it was<br />

certainly the same knife, in spite of the repairs; and these men supported their claims<br />

by referring to several instances in which churches and other structures had been re-<br />

paired in a similar manner, and pointing out that in cases in Avhich the lease of the land<br />

on which they stood was to terminate with the life of the building, the courts had de-<br />

cided that the individuality of the building had not been destroyed by the repairing<br />

process. Whatever the merits of the case may have been, the story goes that the second<br />

of these arguments prevailed, and that it came to be universally admitted that the re-<br />

paired knife was the same old knife, sure enough. But when this decision had been<br />

reached, the owner of the knife produced all the old blades and rivets and bits of<br />

handle, which he had saved up, and assembled them into a new knife. <strong>The</strong>n the question<br />

arose, if the repaired knife was the same knife as the original, then what knife was<br />

this patched-up affair that contained all the identical parts of the first one?<br />

About this time, we imagine, the reader will be wondering what all this has to do<br />

with the heading of this article. Well, let him read what follows, and we fancy he will<br />

see the connection. " <strong>The</strong> Department of Workshops and Factories," says the Coh/.mlns<br />

(Ohio) Dispatch, " has received frequent complaints from citizens of Gahanna as to the<br />

condition of the boiler used at the Gahanna mill, owned by Frank E. Morguer. While<br />

the department does not claim to have jurisdiction over such matters, yet the complaints<br />

became so numerous that an inspection was made by Deputy Inspector J. H. Ellis,<br />

a>sisted by an expert boiler inspector. <strong>The</strong> flues and other parts of the boiler were<br />

found to be thoroughly demoralized, and several holes were punched in the boiler, as a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!