12.06.2013 Views

Antiemetics for reducing vomiting related to acute ... - Update Software

Antiemetics for reducing vomiting related to acute ... - Update Software

Antiemetics for reducing vomiting related to acute ... - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S<strong>to</strong>rk 2006 (Continued)<br />

REHYDRATION THERAPY:<br />

All participants received IV rehydration: 0.9% sodium chloride solution 10-20 mL/kg/<br />

hr. Nature of ORT not reported<br />

Participants judged <strong>to</strong> be hydrated and able <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>lerate oral rehydration were discharged.<br />

Those unable <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>lerate oral rehydration continued <strong>to</strong> receive IV therapy, re-evaluated<br />

at 4 hrs.<br />

Admission at the discretion of the treating pediatric emergency physician.<br />

Patients discharged < 72 hours followed up via telephone (24 &72 hrs) regarding further<br />

<strong>vomiting</strong>, the need <strong>for</strong> further health care<br />

Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOME:<br />

• Need <strong>for</strong> admission.<br />

SECONDARY OUTCOME:<br />

• Tolerance of oral hydration and dehydration status at 2 and 4 hrs<br />

Notes The investiga<strong>to</strong>rs declared that the study was “supported by an unrestricted grant from<br />

Glaxo-Wellcome”, which did not appear <strong>to</strong> represent a risk of bias<br />

Risk of bias<br />

Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />

Random sequence generation (selection<br />

bias)<br />

Low risk Quote: “Randomization was per<strong>for</strong>med in<br />

the pharmacy using specific instructions <strong>to</strong><br />

access a provided table of random numbers<br />

<strong>to</strong> identify the patient’s study group”. Pg<br />

1029<br />

Comment: probably done.<br />

Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “Randomization was per<strong>for</strong>med in<br />

the pharmacy....” Pg1029<br />

Comment: a <strong>for</strong>m of central allocation<br />

was used and it would appear that participants<br />

and investiga<strong>to</strong>rs enrolling participants<br />

could not <strong>for</strong>esee the upcoming assignment<br />

Blinding of participants and personnel<br />

(per<strong>for</strong>mance bias)<br />

All outcomes<br />

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection<br />

bias)<br />

All outcomes<br />

Low risk Participants/ Healthcare providers:<br />

Quote: “all study drug dispensed was uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />

in design and color”. Pg1028<br />

Comment: probably done.<br />

Low risk Outcomes assessors & data analysts: The<br />

healthcare providers were the assessors but<br />

blinding was ensured, and unlikely that the<br />

blinding could have been broken<br />

<strong>Antiemetics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>reducing</strong> <strong>vomiting</strong> <strong>related</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>acute</strong> gastroenteritis in children and adolescents (Review)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!