19.06.2013 Views

Zootaxa, Taxonomy of Serpulidae (Annelida ... - Magnolia Press

Zootaxa, Taxonomy of Serpulidae (Annelida ... - Magnolia Press

Zootaxa, Taxonomy of Serpulidae (Annelida ... - Magnolia Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42D). Abdominal uncini rasp-shaped with 8–11 teeth in pr<strong>of</strong>ile, 2–3 teeth in a row (Fig. 42A, B). Achaetous<br />

anterior abdominal zone absent. Short capillary chaetae present posteriorly. Posterior glandular pad, if present,<br />

hardly visible.<br />

Remarks. Sclerostyla Mörch, 1863 has been synonymized with Pyrgopolon, according to Jäger (1993,<br />

2004) including the genera Hamulus and Turbinia, known only from the fossil record. This opinion is shared<br />

by Belokrys (1994). Fossils have been mentioned from the Maastrichtian (Cretaceous) from e.g., the Southern<br />

Netherlands, Northern Belgium, and the Crimean Mountains. The Recent distribution <strong>of</strong> the genus is the<br />

tropical seas <strong>of</strong> the Americas and is little known because the animals are difficult to find as their tubes are<br />

usually embedded into substrate. The distinguishing feature (autapomorphy) <strong>of</strong> the genus is the funnel-shaped<br />

calcareous operculum continuing into a calcareous peduncle (talon). Opercular talons, but shorter, are also<br />

known in Pomatoleios and Neomicrorbis. The bright red “glandular fields” around the brim <strong>of</strong> the operculum<br />

mentioned by ten Hove (1973 figs 32–33) in the meantime have been found to be compound eyespots (HAtH,<br />

SEM observations); ten Hove’s (1973) revision still remains the most comprehensive source <strong>of</strong> information<br />

about this genus.<br />

1. Pyrgopolon ctenactis (Mörch, 1863), St. Thomas, Caribbean and tropical Pacific America<br />

2. Pyrgopolon differens (Augener, 1922), Barbados, Shelf <strong>of</strong> Surinam<br />

3. Pyrgopolon semiannulatum (ten Hove, 1973), Barbados.<br />

38. Rhodopsis Bush, 1905<br />

(Fig. 43)<br />

Type-species: Rhodopsis pusilla Bush, 1905<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> species: 2<br />

Tube white, circular in cross-section, thin-walled, not increasing in diameter, distal part sometimes erect,<br />

unattached, with peristomes; granular overlay absent. Animals with tube diameter < 0.2 mm. Some tubes may<br />

have one or more unpaired, inverted brood-chambers associated with peristomial rings. Operculum pearshaped,<br />

laterally compressed, usually with well-developed chitinous plate bearing spines. Opercular plate may<br />

be deeply infolded and sunk, angled, within the opercular ampulla, then with halves closely appressed; plate<br />

rarely flat and terminal. Rarely operculum a simple ampulla only. Peduncle smooth, cylindrical, without<br />

wings, separated from ampulla by constriction; inserted proximal to 1 st radiole on one side. Pseudoperculum<br />

absent. Arrangement <strong>of</strong> radioles short pectinate, only 2–3 radioles per lobe. Inter-radiolar membrane absent.<br />

Branchial eyes not observed. Stylodes absent. Mouth palps present. 4–6 thoracic chaetigerous segments<br />

present. Collar (tri-)quadri-lobed. Thoracic membranes short, reaching 1 st thoracic chaetiger. Collar chaetae<br />

absent. Apomatus chaetae present from second chaetiger onward. Thoracic and abdominal uncini rasp-shaped,<br />

with 6–8 teeth in a row in edge view and about 8 teeth in pr<strong>of</strong>ile, anterior fang simple pointed (Fig. 43A, B).<br />

Triangular depression absent. Single capillary chaeta in middle abdominal chaetigers accompanied by single<br />

flat narrow geniculate chaeta with blunt teeth (Fig. 43C). Achaetous anterior abdominal zone long, followed<br />

by up to 15 chaetigers. Posterior capillary chaetae present (Fig. 43D). Posterior glandular pad not observed.<br />

Remarks. This little known species was incompletely described by Bush (1905) from a tiny worm<br />

collected on corals <strong>of</strong>f Bermuda, characterized by numerous irregular spines in chitinous opercular plate. The<br />

type material was lost. Ben-Eliahu & ten Hove (1989) designated the neotype and re-described the species in<br />

detail. They also referred the monotypic Apomatolos Uchida, 1978 to Rhodopsis.<br />

1. Rhodopsis pusilla Bush, 1905, Bermuda, Caribbean, Mediterranean, Indo-West Pacific<br />

2. Rhodopsis simplex (Uchida, 1978), Kushimoto, Japan.<br />

88 · <strong>Zootaxa</strong> 2036 © 2009 <strong>Magnolia</strong> <strong>Press</strong><br />

TEN HOVE & KUPRIYANOVA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!