15.07.2013 Views

Consistent chiral three-nucleon interactions in ... - Theory Center

Consistent chiral three-nucleon interactions in ... - Theory Center

Consistent chiral three-nucleon interactions in ... - Theory Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Three-body Jacobi matrix element transformation <strong>in</strong>to the m-scheme<br />

part of the Hilbert space. Consequently, we now make use of the representation of<br />

the antisymmetrizer that we worked out <strong>in</strong> section 3.4 <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.94)<br />

A = <br />

ncm,lcm<br />

mcm<br />

<br />

E,J,MJ T,MT<br />

<br />

|ncmlcmmcm〉 ⊗ |EJMJTMTi〉〈ncmlcmmcm| ⊗ 〈EJMJTMTi| .<br />

i<br />

(4.11)<br />

If we multiply eq. (4.10) with the antisymmetrizer from the left, we have to consider<br />

the overlap<br />

〈n ′ cml ′ cmm ′ cm|ncmlcmmcm〉〈EJ ′ M ′ JT ′ M ′ JT ′ M ′ Ti|α〉<br />

= cα,i δJ ′ ,J δM ′ J ,MJ δT ′ ,T δM ′ T ,MT δn ′ cm,ncm δl ′ cm,lcm δm ′ cm,mcm δE,2n12+l12+2n3+l3 , (4.12)<br />

with the coefficient of fractional parentage cα,i as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> eq. (3.91). Us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Kronecker deltas of eq. (4.12), we elim<strong>in</strong>ate the correspond<strong>in</strong>g summations and<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> for the antisymmetrized m-scheme state<br />

|abc〉a = √ 3! <br />

Jab,J<br />

α<br />

<br />

lcm,ncm, MJ<br />

mcm<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

ja jb Jab Jab jc J<br />

× <br />

<br />

ma mb<br />

Mab Mab mc<br />

M<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

a b c Jab J J<br />

⎜<br />

⎟<br />

× T⎝<br />

⎠<br />

ncm lcm n12 l12 n3 l3<br />

sab j12 j3 tab T MT<br />

× cα,i |ncmlcmmcm〉 ⊗ |EJMJTMTi〉 .<br />

i<br />

lcm J<br />

mcm MJ<br />

<br />

<br />

J<br />

<br />

M<br />

(4.13)<br />

The only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sum of (4.11) is the one with respect to i. The quantum num-<br />

ber E is now constra<strong>in</strong>ed by E = 2n12 + l12 + 2n3 + l3. The additional factor √ 3!<br />

shows up because of<br />

|abc〉a = √ 3! A |abc〉 , (4.14)<br />

and is needed to have a normalized state after the projection.<br />

Now we are <strong>in</strong> the position to write down the <strong>in</strong>teraction matrix element. We<br />

use the hermitian adjo<strong>in</strong>t of |abc〉a, as given <strong>in</strong> eq. (4.13), to sandwich the <strong>in</strong>terac-<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!