NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Threat</strong> <strong>Abatement</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - Invasion <strong>of</strong> native plant communities by Chrysanthemoides monilifera<br />
5 The impact <strong>of</strong> bitou bush and boneseed invasions on<br />
fauna<br />
In the past, studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> plant invasions on fauna have received little attention (French<br />
and Eardley 1997; Adair and Groves 1998). However, recent studies involving a range <strong>of</strong> weed<br />
species have highlighted the diverse ways in which birds and mammals (Lawrie 2002),<br />
invertebrates (French and Eardley 1997), reptiles (Hoefer pers. comm.) and amphibians<br />
(Wellington pers. comm.) interact with weeds. Some interactions have negative effects on fauna.<br />
For example, Spartina invasions can convert tidal mudflats into grasslands, resulting in the loss <strong>of</strong><br />
habitat for many wading birds (see Lane 1992). Some interactions have positive effects on fauna.<br />
For example, introduced plants with spines or thorns can provide protection to rare mammals like<br />
the southern brown bandicoot (see Regel et al. 1996). Such weed–fauna interactions can also<br />
affect groups <strong>of</strong> species in different ways. For example, bird species were both negatively (8<br />
species) and positively (10 species) affected following Scotch broom invasion (see Bell 1990).<br />
Weeds affect fauna in different ways: altering food resources, feeding substrate, nesting/breeding<br />
sites, shelter and protection from predators, roosting and perching sites, and movement corridors.<br />
An audit system has been proposed by Lawrie (2002) based on observations <strong>of</strong> animals (or animal<br />
signs such as scats) within infested areas, to determine weed–fauna interactions. In Australia 225<br />
bird species have been recorded interacting with 482 introduced plant species, and 43 mammals<br />
interacting with 55 introduced plant species (Lawrie 2002). The information obtained by this audit<br />
system does not provide a complete picture however, as it is biased towards positive interactions.<br />
For example, declines in fauna density are unlikely to be recorded without rigorous studies. In<br />
addition, the proposed audit system does not provide detailed information on the exact nature <strong>of</strong><br />
effects on fauna and detailed studies are needed in some areas to provide information in addition<br />
to that obtained from the proposed audit system.<br />
The removal <strong>of</strong> weeds from sites that have been infested for many years may affect fauna that<br />
have modified their lives as a result <strong>of</strong> these infestations. For example, the removal <strong>of</strong><br />
blackberries in Belair National Park, South Australia may lead to a decline in the threatened<br />
southern brown bandicoot, as blackberries provide protection from predators (see Regel et al.<br />
1996). Blackberry removal programs therefore need to consider the introduction <strong>of</strong> replacement<br />
measures to protect these threatened bandicoots. Historically, such impacts have rarely been<br />
considered in weed control programs.<br />
Information on the interactions between weeds and fauna, both positive and negative, needs to be<br />
collected and incorporated into weed management strategies (Lawrie 2002). Information on the<br />
effect on fauna <strong>of</strong> controlling weeds also needs to be collected and incorporated into such<br />
strategies.<br />
5.1 Interactions between bitou bush and vertebrates (birds and<br />
mammals)<br />
Information on the impact <strong>of</strong> bitou bush invasion (and its control programs) on vertebrates (native<br />
or introduced) is limited. Dodkin and Gilmore (1984) highlighted the need to collect information<br />
on the impacts <strong>of</strong> bitou bush on fauna, however, only a handful <strong>of</strong> studies have been published<br />
since. The impact <strong>of</strong> bitou bush invasion on fauna was acknowledged by the <strong>NSW</strong> Scientific<br />
37