15.07.2013 Views

NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...

NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...

NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54<br />

<strong>Threat</strong> <strong>Abatement</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - Invasion <strong>of</strong> native plant communities by Chrysanthemoides monilifera<br />

following removal <strong>of</strong> bitou bush therefore indicating they were limited by bitou bush<br />

invasion.<br />

< years <strong>of</strong> bitou bush control have not provided information on which species are<br />

affected by bitou bush invasions.<br />

An integrated approach to broad-scale weed management that incorporates plant conservation is<br />

long overdue. Such an approach is needed in order to deliver conservation outcomes from weed<br />

management (Downey 2003a, b, submitted). Thus, the ‘no change in current management’ control<br />

option would be a retrograde step which will not benefit biodiversity conservation.<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> ‘doing nothing’ in terms <strong>of</strong> controlling bitou bush for biodiversity conservation can be<br />

assessed using the estimated cost <strong>of</strong> losing a species due to weed invasion, being $86,700 per<br />

species per year (see Sinden et al. 2004) and the number <strong>of</strong> species identified here as being at risk<br />

(158). Thus, the cost <strong>of</strong> ‘doing nothing’ equates to $13.7 million per year.<br />

Lastly, given the scale <strong>of</strong> the problem the cost <strong>of</strong> doing nothing at sites where species are<br />

threatened far outweighs the economic benefits <strong>of</strong> controlling new or isolated infestations.<br />

Arguments have also been made that control for biodiversity should also address potential or<br />

future impacts. Again, given the scale <strong>of</strong> the problem, the limited nature <strong>of</strong> resources, and the<br />

aims <strong>of</strong> a threat abatement plan, the current impacts to biodiversity are so great and<br />

immediate that they outweigh any potential or future impacts to un-infested areas. Such control<br />

programs are thus outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this plan and should be addressed in other plans (i.e.<br />

regional strategies).<br />

7.9 Roles and responsibilities with respect to bitou bush control<br />

The declaration <strong>of</strong> bitou bush as a noxious weed under the Noxious Weeds Act requires land<br />

managers to control bitou bush (a list <strong>of</strong> all the local control authorities in New South Wales, in<br />

which bitou bush or boneseed is declared noxious, is presented in Appendix 1). In addition, the<br />

control <strong>of</strong> bitou bush and boneseed in areas containing threatened species may require a licence<br />

(see Chapter 2 for further details).<br />

7.9.1 The role <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bitou</strong> TAP in bitou bush management in <strong>NSW</strong><br />

The role <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bitou</strong> TAP is to prioritise the control <strong>of</strong> bitou bush in New South Wales for<br />

species, populations and ecological communities at risk and their locations where control will<br />

have the greatest biodiversity outcomes (see Chapters 4 and 6 and Appendices 3, 5 and 8). While<br />

the TAP aims to address the highest priorities, lower priorities (both threatened biodiversity and<br />

sites) should be used to establish regional and local priorities for bitou bush control. The priority<br />

lists are not definitive and other species and ecological communities in New South Wales<br />

threatened by bitou bush invasion may be identified in the future. The control <strong>of</strong> bitou bush other<br />

than for the priorities established here is outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this TAP, except for the species that<br />

co-occur at control category 1 sites. Control <strong>of</strong> bitou bush at lower priority sites (i.e. Category 2,<br />

3, 4 and 5 sites) is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> local land managers and other strategies e.g. regional bitou<br />

bush strategies. Other funding sources should be maintained to combat bitou bush where<br />

programs are already in place or in other important areas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!