NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
NSW Bitou Bush Threat Abatement Plan - Department of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Threat</strong> <strong>Abatement</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - Invasion <strong>of</strong> native plant communities by Chrysanthemoides monilifera<br />
9 A strategy to minimise the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
Chrysanthemoides monilifera on priority biodiversity<br />
in New South Wales<br />
9.1 Background<br />
The rapid expansion <strong>of</strong> bitou bush along the <strong>NSW</strong> coast over the last 20 years has had significant<br />
impacts on coastal ecosystems and native plant communities. In 1999, these impacts were<br />
acknowledged when the invasion <strong>of</strong> native plant communities by Chrysanthemoides monilifera<br />
was listed as a key threatening process under the TSC Act. Chrysanthemoides monilifera has also<br />
been listed as a Weed Of National Significance (WONS) and in New South Wales, bitou bush is<br />
declared as a noxious weed (under the NW Act). Recently, national, statewide and regional<br />
management strategies have been developed to combat the problem. This TAP focuses bitou bush<br />
and boneseed control programs across New South Wales on specific areas where the threat to<br />
biodiversity is greatest in accordance with the TSC Act.<br />
<strong>Bitou</strong> bush control programs have been undertaken across coastal New South Wales for several<br />
decades. While some local infestations have been successfully controlled and the containment<br />
lines are being moved, control programs have not prevented the spread <strong>of</strong> bitou bush, in part due<br />
to the scale <strong>of</strong> the problem and until recently, the absence <strong>of</strong> a statewide approach to combat it.<br />
Currently, resources are insufficient to control bitou bush effectively in all areas in which it<br />
occurs. In order to utilise resources effectively, control and management efforts need to be<br />
focused on the areas where the benefits <strong>of</strong> control will be greatest. This TAP focuses on<br />
identifying those species, populations or ecological communities that are at the greatest risk from<br />
bitou bush invasion. The identification <strong>of</strong> such biodiversity is then used to establish priority sites<br />
for control programs. It is important to remember that control is still needed for reasons other than<br />
biodiversity conservation (e.g. around access roads, for public use <strong>of</strong> beaches and the prevention<br />
<strong>of</strong> new infestations).<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> boneseed in New South Wales is such that it currently poses limited threats to<br />
biodiversity and most <strong>of</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> this chapter deals with bitou bush only, unless boneseed<br />
is specifically mentioned.<br />
9.2 Aims and objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bitou</strong> TAP<br />
The main objective <strong>of</strong> this plan is to prioritise bitou bush control to areas where the outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />
such controls are most beneficial to native biodiversity, particularly but not exclusively,<br />
threatened flora (species, populations and ecological communities). The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
control programs will be measured through comprehensive monitoring programs.<br />
A core component <strong>of</strong> this TAP is the coordination <strong>of</strong> control programs across different land<br />
tenures and land management organisations throughout New South Wales. The <strong>Bitou</strong> TAP does<br />
not aim to replace or reduce existing priority control programs identified in the national, <strong>NSW</strong><br />
and regional strategies. For example, carrying out bitou bush control in lightly infested areas,<br />
where further spread and/or an increase in density is prevented, is currently cost-effective and<br />
should continue.<br />
61