19.07.2013 Views

SKF Reliability Systems - Library

SKF Reliability Systems - Library

SKF Reliability Systems - Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vol 23 No 3 AMMJ 21<br />

What Is Asset Management<br />

The Organisation and Leadership.<br />

Management support.<br />

To have a truly world class asset management system there must be support at all levels of management.<br />

If corporate management support the cause of managing assets for reliability but the operations manager<br />

3 levels down is not supportive, improvement initiatives are likely to fail. If a Maintenance Manager tries to<br />

instigate a plan for reliability improvement and his direct supervisor is not supportive, again failure is the most<br />

likely result.<br />

Operations and maintenance reliability focus.<br />

This element is in line with management support. In many industries managers associate maintenance with<br />

costs and downtime. Many maintenance people believe their primary role is to fix things as they break. A<br />

business with reliability focus will view breakdowns as an opportunity to improve and the cost to maintain as<br />

being an investment in the future. Focus on reliability should include all aspects of processes that can cause<br />

losses including breakdowns, operational practices, maintenance practices and quality issues. All employees<br />

have a role to play in the improvement of <strong>Reliability</strong> of their equipment. <strong>Reliability</strong> needs to become part of the<br />

organisational culture.<br />

Organisational culture.<br />

To head on the road to asset reliability the workforce must be prepared for organisational change. Some deepseated<br />

beliefs will have to be challenged. For example planned downtime can lead to more uptime, planning<br />

work well will increase tool time by at least 50%, all critical spares must be held in the store, giving operators<br />

some maintenance responsibility will breed ownership, feedback and continuous improvement of reliability<br />

and maintence processes is valued by management.<br />

Performance measures.<br />

These must be in place to determine if improvements have been effective. What measures do you have in<br />

place? There are literally hundreds in use in industry with common ones being Mean Time Between Failures,<br />

Mean Time to Repair, % downtime, Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Compliance to Planned Maintenance<br />

schedule, Reactive vs Preventitive, Proactive, Predictive work, No of breakdown calls. You must have some<br />

performance measures in place or you will not have a base to review improvement against. A common saying<br />

in reliability and operational circles is “You cant manage what you don’t measure”.<br />

Signing the order was easy...<br />

Greg wondered why he had taken so long to get outside assistance. Perhaps it was the fact that<br />

Maintenance consultants seemed to have a bad reputation – “Borrow your watch to tell you the time – then<br />

sell you your watch”. Perhaps it was because they had a reputation for charging exorbitant fees. Perhaps<br />

there was a little bit of pride involved – “It is my job to make this plant safe, efficient and reliable, and I am<br />

going to do it – myself!”<br />

But finally he had to admit that the challenges he faced were too great for any one person to deal with on<br />

their own, and he had contacted Assetivity. It’s amazing how a series of equipment failures (including a<br />

catastrophic conveyor pulley shaft failure that had caused a major safety incident and significant downtime)<br />

can focus the mind, he thought, wryly.<br />

At the initial meeting with the senior Assetivity consultant, Greg had been impressed by the way in which<br />

his problems and issues had been listened to, considered, and absorbed. He had liked the way that, in the<br />

course of their discussion, they had together been able to give focus to the complex network of issues and<br />

opportunities that he faced, and put these in perspective. He been attracted to the down-to-earth and<br />

practical discussion regarding implementation issues. And he was impressed by the focus on developing<br />

and implementing solutions, rather than on selling specific products, tools or methodologies.<br />

It had become clear, in the course of their discussion, that there was an urgent need to “get back to the<br />

basics” – to ensure that the current Preventive Maintenance program was appropriate, and was being properly executed at shop floor level, and that failures<br />

were being prevented, and the causes of those failures eliminated. They had agreed that the first step was to conduct a quick diagnostic review, focusing on<br />

these areas, in order to develop a plan of action. Getting authorisation from the Plant Manager had been surprisingly easy, and Greg was signing the Purchase<br />

Order for this review now. So far, it had been smooth sailing, but Greg knew that the real challenges lay ahead. But, with the involvement of Assetivity, he had<br />

confidence that they were on the right track.<br />

More than availability and reliability...<br />

Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne<br />

Ph +61 8 9474 4044<br />

www.assetivity.com.au<br />

Asset Management Consultants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!