NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM
NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM
NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CALDERÓN <strong>IN</strong>VERSE PROBLEM ON RIEMANN SURFACES 109<br />
Then, splitting the integral and using stationary phase for the 1 − χ term, we obtain<br />
<br />
<br />
e 2iψ/h <br />
<br />
f dvg<br />
≤ (1 − χ)e 2iψ/h <br />
<br />
f dvg<br />
+ χe 2iψ/h <br />
<br />
f dvg<br />
≤ ɛ + Oɛ(h),<br />
M0<br />
M0<br />
which concludes the proof by taking h small enough depending on ɛ. <br />
The proof of Lemma 5.3 is a direct consequence of Lemma 5.4 and Remark<br />
5.2.1. <br />
The second lemma will be proved at the end of this section.<br />
LEMMA 5.5<br />
The estimate<br />
I1 =<br />
<br />
M0<br />
V (a 2 + a 2 )dvg + hCpV (p)|a(p)| 2 Re(e 2iψ(p)/h ) + o(h)<br />
holds true with Cp = 0 and is independent of h.<br />
With Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4, we can write (18) as<br />
<br />
0 = V (a 2 + a 2 )dvg + O(h)<br />
M0<br />
and thus we can conclude that<br />
<br />
0 =<br />
M0<br />
M0<br />
V (a 2 + a 2 )dvg.<br />
Therefore, (18) becomes, with Lemma 5.3,<br />
0 = CpV (p)|a(p)| 2 Re(e 2iψ(p)/h <br />
) + 2 V Re a(b0 + ˜s12 + a0 + ˜r12) dvg + o(1).<br />
M0<br />
Since ψ(p) = 0, we may choose a sequence of hj → 0 such that Re(e 2iψ(p)/hj ) = 1<br />
and another sequence ˜hj → 0 such that Re(e 2iψ(p)/˜hj ) =−1 for all j. Adding the<br />
expansion with h = hj and h = ˜hj, we deduce that<br />
0 = 2CpV (p)|a(p)| 2 + o(1)<br />
as j →∞, and since Cp = 0, a(p) = 0, we conclude that V (p) = 0. The set<br />
of p ∈ M0 for which we can conclude this is dense in M0, by Proposition 2.3.1.<br />
Therefore, we can conclude that V (p) = 0 for all p ∈ M0. <br />
We now prove Lemma 5.5.