20.07.2013 Views

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 MARGULIS and MOHAMMADI<br />

Some important properties of these intervals were proved in [EMM2] and recalled in<br />

Lemma 5.1. What is important for us in Section 7 is property (ii) in Lemma 5.1.This<br />

property, tailored to our current assumptions, gives<br />

|A L<br />

t<br />

−t<br />

L e δ<br />

1/2 (δ)| ≤|It (δ)| ≈ . (81)<br />

T<br />

Proof of Theorem 7.1<br />

Let M be a large number which is fixed for now. Let t>0 be a large number. Assume<br />

also that j is a large number. We assume throughout that η = η1, where η1 is as in<br />

Lemma 7.3. LetL0,L1 be nonexceptional null subspaces such that {〈v Lk , pξ〉B} <<br />

1/2 j for k = 0, 1 and such that v L0 ≤v L1 are minimal with these properties.<br />

Indeed, we fix any two such subspaces if there are more than two subspaces satisfying<br />

these conditions. Assume that e t /2 j+i0+1 ≤v L 2 jη2 , where η2 is as in Lemma 7.3. Now using this<br />

lemma, we see that, for all i ≤ i0, the number of null subspaces L with e t /2 j+i+1 ≤<br />

v L i0, the subspaces of norm at most e t /2 i+j have<br />

no contribution to the set At(1/2 j ), that is, A L t (1/2j ) =∅for all such subspaces L.<br />

Hence if we use this fact and (81), we have: if j is such that Case 1 holds, then<br />

we have<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lnull<br />

AL <br />

1<br />

t<br />

2j <br />

<br />

<br />

≤<br />

i<br />

≤ 1<br />

2 j(1+η)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

et /(2i+j+1 )≤vL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!