20.07.2013 Views

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

NEAR OPTIMAL BOUNDS IN FREIMAN'S THEOREM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 MARGULIS and MOHAMMADI<br />

all j>s,we have<br />

<br />

1<br />

Ct<br />

2j <br />

<br />

+<br />

<br />

Bt<br />

<br />

1<br />

2j <br />

<br />

+<br />

<br />

At<br />

1<br />

2 j<br />

<br />

\ <br />

L∈Qt ( 1<br />

2j ,ε)<br />

AL <br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

t ,ε <<br />

2j 1<br />

. (68)<br />

2 (1+ε/4)j<br />

Let η1 < 1/4 be as in Proposition 5.3, andletη = η1/2. The Conclusions of<br />

Corollaries 5.5 and 5.11 hold with this η and the corresponding τ.Now let Q < t (1/2j ,ε)<br />

(resp., Q ≥ t (1/2 j ,ε)) be the set of quasi-null subspaces in Qt(1/2 j ,ε) with norm less<br />

than M (resp., greater than or equal to M.)Wehave<br />

| <br />

L∈Q < t (1/2j ,ε) AL 1<br />

t (<br />

| <br />

L∈Q ≥ t (1/2 j ,ε) AL t<br />

( 1<br />

2 j ,ε)|≤ <br />

i<br />

t i+j e /(2 )<br />

i et /(2i+j+1 )<br />

t i+j e /(2 )<br />

et /(2i+j+1 )<br />

2 j ,ε)| ≤ <br />

<br />

L |It (δ)| ≤C1 i<br />

L |It (δ)|≤C2<br />

<br />

<br />

i<br />

1<br />

2 (1+η)j+i/2 +<br />

1<br />

2 (1+η)j+i/2 ,<br />

e −τt<br />

2 (1/2−τ)i+(1−τ)j<br />

where C1 and C2 are absolute constants independent of µ1. The inequality in the<br />

first line above follows from Corollary 5.5 and from the fact that the definition of<br />

Qt(1/2 j ,ε) excludes exceptional subspaces. The inequalities in the second line follow<br />

from Corollary 5.11. Wenowhave<br />

<br />

2 j<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

j>s<br />

L∈Qt<br />

<br />

1<br />

2j ,ε<br />

<br />

,<br />

(69)<br />

AL <br />

1<br />

<br />

1<br />

t ,ε ≤ C<br />

2j 2s 1<br />

<br />

+ . (70)<br />

η M<br />

Here C ′ is an absolute constant which depends on C in (70). This inequality together<br />

with (68) gives<br />

<br />

K<br />

( fgr) ˜ ><br />

s (atKqξ) dk ≤ C′<br />

+ C<br />

2εs/4 <br />

1 1<br />

+<br />

2ηs M<br />

<br />

. (71)<br />

Recall that M was chosen such that C/M < ɛ/6. Now we choose s large enough<br />

such that the right-hand side of (71)islessthanɛ/2. The above estimate holds for all<br />

r.<br />

As we mentioned in the proof of Theorem 3.2, There exists r0 = r0(s, ɛ) such<br />

that if r>r0, then µ(A(r)) r0(s, ɛ). We have<br />

lim sup<br />

t→∞<br />

<br />

K<br />

( fgr) ˜ ≤<br />

s (atkqξ)ν(k) dk ≤ 2 s lim sup<br />

t→∞<br />

<br />

K<br />

gr(atkqξ)ν(k) dk ≤ ɛ/2.<br />

(72)<br />

Thus (72) and(71) give:ifr>r0(s, ε), then<br />

<br />

lim sup<br />

t→∞<br />

fgr(atkqξ) ˜ dk < ɛ. (73)<br />

K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!