A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chaffey for Plaintiff.<br />
On motion of Chaffey the usual decree<br />
on bill for sale under judgment.<br />
Although not technically Equity records, two other volumes have certain<br />
connections with suits commenced on Equity side. These are record books that<br />
contain minutes of proceedings of Queen's Bench En Banc. Court of Queen's<br />
Bench En Banc acted as the appellate court for suits appealed from County<br />
Court, Surrogate Court. and Queen's Bench (including Equity).<br />
Chambers and En Banc Record Book (1 872-74; 1883-88) is entitled Coud<br />
of Queen's Bench, Manitoba, Term Book, [?]6 Victoria To . .. . As the dates<br />
indicate, the volume records actions from two different periods of Queen's Bench<br />
activity. The first section of the volume begins October 8, 1872, with Court of<br />
Queen's Bench first hearing, and concludes June 29, 1874. Chief Justice Morris<br />
heard the October terrn cases; Chief Justice Wood and Justices McKeagney and<br />
Bétournay began hearings in January of 1873. Actions in this section appear to<br />
be Chambers and En Banc cases and a few can be identified as having been<br />
referred from Equity. Suit numbers are, oddly, rather high. Barber vs Dease,<br />
heard at the first sitting of the court. October 8, 1872, is listed as case 189. Why<br />
is the case number so high? Were suits carried over from General Quarterly<br />
Court, retaining the numbers that they had in that court? Were suits filed and<br />
did they accumulate between constitution of the Supreme Court in 1871 and first<br />
court hearing in 1872? Were appeals suits assigned a higher block of numbers,<br />
beginning perhaps at 150? These questions rernain unanswered at the tirne of