A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
A STUDY IN LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDS SHARON ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
mandate and jurisdiction of the creating body. Each kind of record, from the<br />
smallest praecipe to the largest index, has its place and its importance.<br />
It is interesting to contemplate the long history of equitable justice. In<br />
England, equity began its development within the common law. The necessity<br />
for fair treatment under the law was recognized and met by clergy-judges. They<br />
included canon law and 'God's laW as part of their means of dispensing fair<br />
justice. However, the usefulness of their broad jurisdidion was confounded by<br />
the intriacies of the writ systern. Equity became diffiailt to obtain as<br />
administrative restrictions obstructed the avenue to it. But the need for equity<br />
persisted.<br />
A new body ernerged. Court of Chancery employed a reinvented writ that<br />
better served the requirements of justice. The chancellor had at his disposal the<br />
injunction and the decree of specific performance. But Chancery was a court of<br />
record. As such, it ernbraced two aspects, the judicial, and the administrative.<br />
Like Common Law before it, Chancery eventually succumbed to rigidity of<br />
precedent on the judicial side, and proliferation of paperwork on the<br />
administrative side. Still the need for equity persisted.<br />
Refoms were needed in order for equitable justice to prevail. In England<br />
the Judicature Acts created a new streamlined Supreme Court of Judicature with<br />
jurisdiction over both law and equity. In Manitoba the Queen's Bench Act<br />
amalgamated Common Law and Equity into a new Court of Queen's Bench.<br />
Separated administrations were drawn together into one, and the restructured