31.07.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mechanisms no longer had a foothold in prices; and, institutions salvaged a modicum<br />

of coherence between average growth of wages and industrial productivity. On top of<br />

that, working-class consumption as well was an element in this revved-up<br />

productivity; standardised mechanisation(i.e. mass production) afforded standardised<br />

commodities which wage-earners then purchased(i.e. mass consumption); ‘Fordism<br />

precisely marked the entry of goods produced with significant productivity gains into<br />

wage-earners’ consumption’.<br />

Furthermore, regulationists have been the indignant votaries of empirical analysis and<br />

‘marvelled at this... with the ardour of neophytes: ‘this return to empirical assessment,<br />

even when difficult and invariably unsatisfying given the precise origin of statistics<br />

used, introduces the possibility of refuting the initial theoretical framework, however<br />

satisfying it might be from a strictly logical standpoint[(Bertrand et al., 1980)]’(ibid.).<br />

Alas, in that and on many other quodlibets, regulation theory was not even nominally<br />

au fait with any ‘living Marxism’.<br />

2.2 Political Economy of Crisis<br />

Not all economic theories are fond of crisis as explanandum. In fact, neoclassical<br />

economics considers crises unco in terms of the spontaneous bliss of market<br />

economies. Markets supposedly are mechanisms that are utterly recalcitrant to any<br />

felo-de-se. For that mainstream, crises are thereby sabotages to the price system from<br />

the outside. Such an understanding often scandalised Marx for whom the cyclical<br />

crises of the capitalist mode of production were absolute intimations of its inner<br />

contradictions in that sudden devalorisation of capital values stemmed from capital<br />

valorisation itself. So there is first this fact that capitalist crises as crises of capitalist<br />

accumulation have never stagnated into an inaudible aside in much of Marx’s analysis<br />

and Marxist political economy. Needless to say, crisis as explanandum are totemic to<br />

any theory of social/historical change. Yet crisis has even a fiercer bite on a theory<br />

such as Marxism which profusely anticipates the self-extinction of capitalism as a<br />

mode of production(i.e. its radical transformation). Therefore almost all Marxists are<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!