31.07.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strictly inflationary or disinflationary forms of financial crisis should not, thereby, be<br />

a subterfuge for otherwise social and political patterns of credit<br />

decentralisation/centralisation in monetary economies. As such, fractionated or<br />

homogenous monetary systems are plain ideal categories; and are indelibly<br />

counterfactual in terms of the monetary history of capitalist economies. In fact,<br />

financial crises are not about the degree of inflation or disinflation in a monetary<br />

system but about the politics of debt through which inflationist or disinflationist<br />

design of monetary restructuring vis-a-vis the disproportionalities of capitalist<br />

production politically institute either a crisis fix or a vicious cycle, which would not,<br />

however, in the meantime rescind the monetary form of realisation. Paramount to<br />

such a theory of money, is exactly an analysis of those vicious cycles and exits from<br />

crises since both debtor-led and creditor-led restructuring of credit, though these are<br />

de novo theoretically indeterminate political strategies, can anticipate a de-centering<br />

of money solidarity in a bourgeouis economy. In these terms, an inflationary<br />

monetary crisis is an upshot of debtor-led centralisation of credit; that is, each<br />

commodity would earn its monetary counterpart regardless of the proverbial<br />

realisation of surplus value. Here money is no longer invidious; it is a mundane and<br />

lenient asset. Yet, in a credit hierarchy, such restructuring is always piecemeal and<br />

partial. In fact, John Grahl notes that ‘crisis is seen as running through distinct phases<br />

with differing macroeconomic characteristics’(2000:296). In a vicious cycle of such<br />

inflationary centralisation, first abating element, for regulationists and contra<br />

quantitativists, would be money as a ‘unit of account’, then money as ‘store of value’,<br />

and finally money as intermediary of trade.<br />

Sign of deflationary crisis, on the other hand, is a creditor-led decentralisation of<br />

credit. This time, financing and debt-rescheduling are much more horizontal at the<br />

level of the enterprise and each of those routines is less and less negotiable because<br />

commercial financial institutions are already reluctant towards inflationist/vertical<br />

antevalidation of commodity values. In monetary economies in which each unit is<br />

more or less a part of the borrowing/funding network, disinflationary strategy plans<br />

for an incomeless or a money-tight economy. Recessionary consequences of such a<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!