31.07.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

plan must be perspicuous. Even though monetary systems are always-already<br />

hierarchical in late capitalist economies and plenary forms of credit centralising/de-<br />

centralising crises are rare historical phenomena, regulationists do not consider the<br />

viciously cyclical patterns of such monetary contradictions in themselves as a cul-de-<br />

sac in research. That is to say, the latter argue that in financial societies crisis and<br />

non-crisis are infinitely close. The very contradictions of the politics of money -the<br />

competitive strategies around the terms of credit- gradually but substantially extenuate<br />

the once all-out prise en compte of the designated central money. Inflationary or<br />

disinflationary perturbations against money solidarity, i.e. central money, themselves<br />

however would increasingly stymie the sheer dilatory element in such strategies of<br />

restructuring. Thus, in the very apogee of a vicious cycle, cohorts of financiers and/or<br />

debtors are more of an inchoate clique than a veridical coterie of protagonists. The<br />

very narrowing of these strategic nuances would resort to a social auditioning, as it<br />

were, of another money category coterminous in its tentativeness with the re-<br />

designing of financial solidarity.<br />

Rapport salarial on the other hand is about a basic form of dispossession in capitalist<br />

societies. In capitalism for the first time, the lathes of labour are not under the<br />

possession of the labourer but that of another class and collectively so. For<br />

regulationists, wage relation has two facets, that of property and that of possession. It<br />

is the wage contract that structures the dispossession in the form of property. Wage<br />

contract as an institution touches upon the legal mechanisms of this dispossession or<br />

the rights of the propertied on both the accoutrements of production and the<br />

commodities; yet, standard wage contract is substantially an agreement on terms of<br />

the waged-work between the capitalist and the wage-earner which anticipates the price<br />

and rate of work as well as the hour of the day when work shall adjourn. With the<br />

sale of collective labour-power, wage-labourers earn a value in money, that is the<br />

wage. Money wage and the commodities the workers buy with that are the sole<br />

property of the proleterianised/wage-earning classes. In a wage society, that value in<br />

money, under the terms of the structure of dispossession through wage relation,<br />

affords a certain standard of living –a norm of consumption. Matter-of-factly, the<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!