31.07.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mechanisms that are set of, more or less automatically ... we therefore need a theory of<br />

a malign invisible hand’(ibid.:23).<br />

However, the real bite is in another piece of ridicule Brenner has against the supply-<br />

side theories. Contra Glyn, Panitch and regulationists, he argues that from late 1950s<br />

and mid-1960s onwards, it was the capitalists that had been the feverish aggressors in<br />

the dramatic harassment of unionised labour. In fact, the consequences of that openly<br />

truculent traducement have been quite stark in that the unionised segments vis-a-vis<br />

the non-unionised segments of working class have since considerably decreased as did<br />

the wage increases the former has negotiated in contrast to those of the latter in most<br />

industrialised economies. In Brenner’s words, ‘workers’ resistance was unable to<br />

prevent manufacturers employers from securing major reductions in the growth of<br />

wages during the 1960s and early 1970s, as manufacturing real wage increase between<br />

1965 and 1973 was more than a third lower than that between 1948 and<br />

1965’(2005:227). Thereby, Full Employment Profit Squeeze theory, especially in its<br />

contradictions of Keynesianism format, is counterfactual and theoretically unsound<br />

since even this systematic and colossal capitalist calumny against the working class<br />

and lowered levels of social or otherwise wage growth has not extinguished the<br />

declining profitability of industrial sectors and, secondly, since the second world war<br />

trade unions and social-democratic parties, insofar as these were truly working class<br />

institutions, had generally bullied the proleterianised segments of the society toward a<br />

strict imprimatur with the schedule of businesses and plans for a wage drogue<br />

especially when employees themselves were gallant about a further increase in their<br />

income(Brenner 1998:21,139).<br />

Brenner then analyses the terms of secular capitalist stagnation as ‘producers ... take<br />

remedial action that fails to bring about an adjustment and ends up exacerbating the<br />

difficulties of the initial situation’ with ‘the tendency of producers to develop the<br />

productive forces and increase economic productiveness by means of installation of<br />

increasingly cheap and effective methods of production, without regard for existing<br />

investments and their requirements for realization, with the result that aggregate<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!