31.07.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Castree(1999:150) on Postone), and not because of the dull aside that all<br />

commodities(as use-value and concrete labour) in their utter bareness are social<br />

labour. It is precisely in these terms that the ‘social process of abstraction[(real<br />

abstraction as opposed to conceptual abstraction)] to which the commodity form<br />

refers also entails a determinate process of quantification’(Postone 1993:189-90).<br />

Marxian concepts of ‘socially necessary labour time’ and ‘abstract labour’ are not,<br />

therefore, about value as some technical coefficient, but about value as the ‘self-<br />

mediating’ facet of commodities. Value as a self-mediating social category, in Marx,<br />

is about the ‘social necessity’ of a self-mediating procedure of<br />

quantification(foremostly, of labour time); and not about the fact that quantification as<br />

such is a socially anachronistic or epistemologically impractical procedure.<br />

What of value as such? Postone argues that ‘[a]lthough value ... is the objectification<br />

of labour, it is an objectification of abstract labour’(ibid.:188). Thereby, since the<br />

general quasi-objective basis for the self-mediating element in commodities in<br />

capitalism is labour that (labour)time is integral to the socially mediating<br />

quantification of value; or better said, ‘[b]ecause of the mediating character of labour<br />

in capitalism, its measure has a socially mediating character as well’(ibid.:189).<br />

Value of a commodity is basically its socially necessary labour time. The latter is the<br />

average time socially necessary for the production of that commodity, but more<br />

profoundly, abstract labour, and value as the objectification of that abstract labour, is<br />

first about the social necessity of the quantification of labour on the basis of an<br />

abstract temporality as opposed to some technical average or the technical procedure<br />

for timing that average. Secondly, on top of the fact that labour time is the socially<br />

determinate parameter of value, the category of ‘socially necessary labour time’<br />

insinuates a determinate quantification of value. In more concise words, even when<br />

labour time in the production of a commodity is in excess of the socially necessary<br />

average, its value equals that of the unchanged average labour time in the production<br />

of that commodity.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!