View Original - Middle East Technical University
View Original - Middle East Technical University
View Original - Middle East Technical University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Castree(1999:150) on Postone), and not because of the dull aside that all<br />
commodities(as use-value and concrete labour) in their utter bareness are social<br />
labour. It is precisely in these terms that the ‘social process of abstraction[(real<br />
abstraction as opposed to conceptual abstraction)] to which the commodity form<br />
refers also entails a determinate process of quantification’(Postone 1993:189-90).<br />
Marxian concepts of ‘socially necessary labour time’ and ‘abstract labour’ are not,<br />
therefore, about value as some technical coefficient, but about value as the ‘self-<br />
mediating’ facet of commodities. Value as a self-mediating social category, in Marx,<br />
is about the ‘social necessity’ of a self-mediating procedure of<br />
quantification(foremostly, of labour time); and not about the fact that quantification as<br />
such is a socially anachronistic or epistemologically impractical procedure.<br />
What of value as such? Postone argues that ‘[a]lthough value ... is the objectification<br />
of labour, it is an objectification of abstract labour’(ibid.:188). Thereby, since the<br />
general quasi-objective basis for the self-mediating element in commodities in<br />
capitalism is labour that (labour)time is integral to the socially mediating<br />
quantification of value; or better said, ‘[b]ecause of the mediating character of labour<br />
in capitalism, its measure has a socially mediating character as well’(ibid.:189).<br />
Value of a commodity is basically its socially necessary labour time. The latter is the<br />
average time socially necessary for the production of that commodity, but more<br />
profoundly, abstract labour, and value as the objectification of that abstract labour, is<br />
first about the social necessity of the quantification of labour on the basis of an<br />
abstract temporality as opposed to some technical average or the technical procedure<br />
for timing that average. Secondly, on top of the fact that labour time is the socially<br />
determinate parameter of value, the category of ‘socially necessary labour time’<br />
insinuates a determinate quantification of value. In more concise words, even when<br />
labour time in the production of a commodity is in excess of the socially necessary<br />
average, its value equals that of the unchanged average labour time in the production<br />
of that commodity.<br />
36