Minutes of the 19th meeting - Archaeological Survey of India
Minutes of the 19th meeting - Archaeological Survey of India
Minutes of the 19th meeting - Archaeological Survey of India
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Paranja<br />
pe,<br />
Shanwa<br />
r Peth,<br />
Pune.<br />
20. Siva<br />
Temple,<br />
Ambern<br />
ath,<br />
Distt.<br />
Thane<br />
submitt<br />
ed by<br />
Dy.<br />
Enginee<br />
r, PW<br />
subdivision,<br />
Ulhasna<br />
gar,<br />
Mahara<br />
shtra<br />
21 Plot<br />
No.2481<br />
, CS<br />
No.2/42<br />
1, Parel-<br />
Sewree<br />
Division<br />
F Ward,<br />
Parel,<br />
- - - - - - - SA, Mumbai<br />
Circle has<br />
informed that <strong>the</strong><br />
proposal<br />
submitted by <strong>the</strong><br />
applicant is<br />
incomplete and<br />
hence it is<br />
difficult to submit<br />
a report.<br />
Monoli<br />
thic bas<br />
relief<br />
depicti<br />
ng Siva<br />
Prohibit<br />
ed area<br />
a)<br />
11.2<br />
5 m<br />
b)<br />
NA<br />
The proposal is<br />
for <strong>the</strong> addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> third and<br />
fourth floors<br />
over <strong>the</strong><br />
existing<br />
building.<br />
a)The sculpture is<br />
housed in a room<br />
<strong>of</strong> modern times.<br />
The surrounding<br />
area is thickly<br />
populated &<br />
partially<br />
developed with<br />
residential-cum-<br />
23<br />
- - A Writ Petition<br />
has been filed by<br />
one Shri Shrikant<br />
Hatkar against<br />
Union <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>,<br />
Secretary, GOI,<br />
DG, SA and Care<br />
taker as well as<br />
M/S New Look<br />
SA, Mumbai Circle<br />
informed that <strong>the</strong><br />
proposal submitted by<br />
<strong>the</strong> applicant is<br />
incomplete and hence it<br />
is difficult to submit a<br />
report.<br />
In absence <strong>of</strong> details,<br />
<strong>the</strong> matter was deferred.<br />
The Committee<br />
observed that in view <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />
monolithic bas relief<br />
which is declared as<br />
protected is not in situ<br />
and was found at some<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r location during<br />
<strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> a
Change language