Ecological and anthropogenic covariates ... - GANGAPEDIA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Literature Cited Arzoumanian, Z., J. Holmberg, and B. Norman. 2005. An astronomical pattern- matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:999-1011. Bayliss, P., G. J. W. Webb, P. J. Whitehead, K. Dempsey, and A. Smith. 1986. Estimating the abundance of saltwater crocodiles, Crocodylus-porosus schneider, in tidal wetlands of the northern territory - a mark-recapture experiment to correct spotlight counts to absolute numbers, and the calibration of helicopter and spotlight counts. Australian Wildlife Research 13:309-320. Bayliss.P. 1987. Survey methods and monitoring within crocodile management programmes. Pp. 157-175. In: Webb, G.J.W., Manolis, S.C.,and Whitehead, P.J. [Eds.] Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators. Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty. Ltd. in association with the Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory. 552 pp. Brochu, C. A. 1997. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Systematic Biology 46:479-522. Bustard, HR and LAK Singh. 1977. Studies on the Indian Gharial Gavialis gangeticus (GMELIN) (REPTILIA,CROCODILIA) – I: Estimation of body length from scute length. Indian Forester 103 (2): 140-149. Champion,H.G.,Seth,S.K.,1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Manager of Publication, Delhi. pp. 404. Choudhury, B.C., Singh,LAK., Rao, R.J., Basu, D., Sharma,R.K., Hussain,S.A., Andrews,H.V., Whitaker,N., Whitaker,R., Lenin,J., Maskey,T., Cadi,A., Rashid,S.M.A., Choudhury,A.A., Dahal,B., Win Ko Ko, U., Thorbjarnarson, J 59
and Ross, JP. 2007. Gavialis gangeticus. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. . Downloaded on 22 November 2009. Creel, S. and N. M. Creel. 1996. Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus (vol 50, pg 1325, 1995). Animal Behaviour 51:499-499. Da-Silva, C. Q., J. Rodrigues, J. G. Leite, and L. A. Milan. 2003. Bayesian estimation of the size of a closed population using photo-ID data with part of the population uncatchable. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 32:677- 696. Da Silva, C., Zeh J., Madigan D,, Laake J., Rugh D., Baraff L., Koski W., and Miller G. 2000. Capture-recapture estimation of bowhead whale population size using photo-identification data. Journal of Cetacean Management, 2:45–61. Dudgeon, D. 2000. Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: Prospects for riverine biodiversity. Bioscience 50:793-806. Gauthier-Clerc, M., J. P. Gendner, C. A. Ribic, W. R. Fraser, E. J. Woehler, S. Descamps, C. Gilly, C. Le Bohec, and Y. Le Maho. 2004. Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B- Biological Sciences 271:S423-S426. http://www.gharialconservation.org/. Accessed on 27.11.09. Hussain SA. 1991. Ecology of gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) in National Chambal Sanctuary, India. MPhil dissertation. Centre for Wildlife and Ornithology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh Hussain, S. A. 1999. Reproductive success, hatchling survival and rate of increase of gharial Gavialis gangeticus in National Chambal Sanctuary, India. Biological Conservation 87:261-268. 60
Page 1 and 2:
Ecological and anthropogenic covari
Page 3 and 4:
variable data like river discharge,
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 7 and 8:
In the face of increasing proposals
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 1 Ecological and Anthropoge
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction Humans live disproport
Page 13 and 14: Despite the release of over 5000 yo
Page 15 and 16: its 523 km run, the river passes th
Page 17 and 18: sites considered favourble based on
Page 19 and 20: correction factor for the float mea
Page 21 and 22: Variable (type) Measurement Details
Page 23 and 24: interpolation deriving from regiona
Page 25 and 26: the effects of covariates measured
Page 27 and 28: We compared Zero-Inflated Poisson (
Page 29 and 30: Assessing changes in habitat availa
Page 31 and 32: Figure 6: Box-and-whiskers plots co
Page 33 and 34: Occasion 1: Residual mean deviance
Page 35 and 36: Occasion 3: Residual mean deviance:
Page 37 and 38: Discussion Humans have preferential
Page 39 and 40: Tucker et al. (1997) report that pr
Page 41 and 42: once caught in the net are wary of
Page 43 and 44: Bustard, HR and LAK Singh. 1977. St
Page 45 and 46: Hutton, J. 1989. Movements, home ra
Page 47 and 48: Oliver, M.A., R. Webster. 1990. Kri
Page 49 and 50: Chapter 2 Photographic identificati
Page 51 and 52: Hussain, 2009); and is especially a
Page 53 and 54: data also enables the estimation of
Page 55 and 56: A 600km stretch of the Chambal Rive
Page 57 and 58: Marked animals were accorded no exc
Page 59 and 60: Single-crested region Figure 2: Lat
Page 61 and 62: A B C Capture: 07.02.2010 Figure 1.
Page 63: (Nichols, 1992). Since gharials are
Page 67 and 68: Mazzoil M., McCulloch S.D., Defran
Page 69 and 70: GENERAL CONCLUSION Humans have pref
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX - 1 Figure 1: Scatter plot
Page 73 and 74: Figure 2: Scatter plots representin
show all

Ecological and anthropogenic covariates ... - GANGAPEDIA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?