Ecological and anthropogenic covariates ... - GANGAPEDIA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hussain, S. A. 2009. Basking site and water depth selection by gharial Gavialis gangeticus Gmelin 1789 (Crocodylia, Reptilia) in National Chambal Sanctuary, India and its implication for river conservation. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19:127-133. Jain, S.K., Agarwal, P.K., Singh, V.P.2007. Hydrology andWater Resources of India.Water Science and Technology Library. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. p. 1258. Karanth, K. U. 1995. Estimating Tiger Panthera-Tigris Populations From Camera- Trap Data Using Capture-Recapture Models. Biological Conservation 71:333- 338. Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852-2862. Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925-2937. Kelly, M.J. 2001. Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: an examplle from Serengeti cheetahs. J. Mammal. 82, 440-449. Lukacs, P. 2009. Closed population capture-recapture models. Ch 14 in E. Cooch, and G. White, editors. Program MARK: a gentle introduction. Available: http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/ (July 2009). Magnuson, W.E. 1982. Techniques for surveying crocodilians. Pp. 389-403 in Crocodiles. Proceedings of the 5 th Working Meeting of the IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialist Group. Gainesville, Florida, USA, 12-16 August 1980. IUCN: Gland. Mani, M.S. 1974. Ecology and Biogeography of India. W. Junk. The Hague. 61
Mazzoil M., McCulloch S.D., Defran R.H., Murdoch M.E. 2004. Use of Digital Photography and Analysis of Dorsal Fins for Photo-Identification of Bottlenose Dolphins. Aquatic Mammals, 30: 209-219. McGregor, P. And Peake, T. 1998. The role of individual identification in conservation biology. In Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology: 31-35. TM Caro (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press. McMahon, C. R., C. J. A. Bradshaw, and G. C. Hays. 2006. Branding can be justified in vital conservation research. Nature 439:392-392. MEA. 2006. Inland water systems. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Reports. Washington, DC. Newton I, 1995. The contribution of some recent research on birds to ecological understanding. J Anim Ecol 64:675-696. Nichols, JD. 1992. Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. BioScience 42:94–102. Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical- inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs:7-135. Peake TM, 1997. Variation in the vocal behaviour of the corncrake Crex crex: potential for conservation. (Ph.D. thesis) Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Rohner C, 1996. The numerical response of great horned owls to the snowshoe hare cycle, consequences of non-territorial "floaters" on demography. J Anim Ecol 65:359-370. Sala, O. E., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber- Sanwald, L. F. Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D. M. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N. L. Poff, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. 62
Page 1 and 2:
Ecological and anthropogenic covari
Page 3 and 4:
variable data like river discharge,
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 7 and 8:
In the face of increasing proposals
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 1 Ecological and Anthropoge
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction Humans live disproport
Page 13 and 14:
Despite the release of over 5000 yo
Page 15 and 16: its 523 km run, the river passes th
Page 17 and 18: sites considered favourble based on
Page 19 and 20: correction factor for the float mea
Page 21 and 22: Variable (type) Measurement Details
Page 23 and 24: interpolation deriving from regiona
Page 25 and 26: the effects of covariates measured
Page 27 and 28: We compared Zero-Inflated Poisson (
Page 29 and 30: Assessing changes in habitat availa
Page 31 and 32: Figure 6: Box-and-whiskers plots co
Page 33 and 34: Occasion 1: Residual mean deviance
Page 35 and 36: Occasion 3: Residual mean deviance:
Page 37 and 38: Discussion Humans have preferential
Page 39 and 40: Tucker et al. (1997) report that pr
Page 41 and 42: once caught in the net are wary of
Page 43 and 44: Bustard, HR and LAK Singh. 1977. St
Page 45 and 46: Hutton, J. 1989. Movements, home ra
Page 47 and 48: Oliver, M.A., R. Webster. 1990. Kri
Page 49 and 50: Chapter 2 Photographic identificati
Page 51 and 52: Hussain, 2009); and is especially a
Page 53 and 54: data also enables the estimation of
Page 55 and 56: A 600km stretch of the Chambal Rive
Page 57 and 58: Marked animals were accorded no exc
Page 59 and 60: Single-crested region Figure 2: Lat
Page 61 and 62: A B C Capture: 07.02.2010 Figure 1.
Page 63 and 64: (Nichols, 1992). Since gharials are
Page 65: and Ross, JP. 2007. Gavialis ganget
Page 69 and 70: GENERAL CONCLUSION Humans have pref
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX - 1 Figure 1: Scatter plot
Page 73 and 74: Figure 2: Scatter plots representin
show all

Ecological and anthropogenic covariates ... - GANGAPEDIA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?