03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPLICATIONS OF HYPOGENIC TRANSVERSE SPELEOGENESIS<br />

the hypogene karst concept presented in this book, it can<br />

be easily seen that these conditions are associated with<br />

confined transverse speleogenesis and are largely created<br />

by it.<br />

At the regional scale, nearly horizontal flow mostly<br />

occurs in the basal aquifer (Lamotte and Bonneterre<br />

Formations), which is confined by the thin Davis Shale.<br />

The hydrostratigraphy is shown in part 3 of Figure 60. The<br />

main deposits are aerially associated with a highpermeability<br />

lens, the Viburnum Trend, which is 20 km<br />

wide and about 100 km long. It is situated over the<br />

basement arch, but where the topographic elevations are<br />

the lowest. The Viburnum Trend affects regional flow<br />

patterns, creates a large discharge zone and focuses flow<br />

upon it, and induces a hydrothermal anomaly. Ore<br />

mineralization patterns at the deposit-scale are controlled<br />

by sandstone pinchouts, karstic channels and breccia zones<br />

(which are also karstic channels in this case).<br />

It is beyond the scope of this paper to offer an<br />

elaborate speleogenetic/ore origin conceptual model for<br />

MVT deposits of the Ozark Dome, but the hydrogeologic<br />

conditions described above seem to be generally favorable<br />

for hypogene speleogenesis, which could be a major factor<br />

in the formation of ores:<br />

In the basal aquifer system regional lateral flow of<br />

brines occurred mainly through sandstone units, with<br />

unkarstified carbonate strata serving as intervening beds.<br />

The Ozark Dome area and local pinchouts of the basal<br />

sandstone within it were favorable sites for transverse<br />

speleogenesis to commence through the overlying<br />

carbonate Bonnetere Formation, due to the combined<br />

ascending potential of both the regional topography-driven<br />

flow system and local thermal anomalies induced by the<br />

direct rise of hot fluids from fractured Precambrian<br />

basement into the carbonates.<br />

Multiple dissolution mechanisms for speleogenesis<br />

could operate; various mixing effects (particularly invoked<br />

in these settings), dissolution due to increased calcite<br />

solubility in cooling hydrothermal paths, sulfuric acid,<br />

dedolomitization, etc. (see Section 3.6); this should be the<br />

subject of a separate region- and deposit-specific analysis.<br />

Transverse speleogenesis changed vertical permeability<br />

and opened migration paths across carbonate units and the<br />

confining bed (through fracturing and collapsing in<br />

response to growing cave porosity below), enhancing flow<br />

and regional discharge and inducing various reactions at<br />

geochemical thresholds that commonly occur along crossformational<br />

paths. Some of these thresholds could favor<br />

ore deposition in previously created karst porosity at some<br />

stages.<br />

Fluid migration, speleogenesis and ore deposition were<br />

transient processes, adapting to the regional dynamics of<br />

landscape evolution as well as to deposit-scale dynamics of<br />

porosity and permeability changes. A number of<br />

geochemical models for ore formation can be adapted to fit<br />

the above hydrogeologic/speleogenetic scheme.<br />

Figure 60. 1 = Geologic section A–A’ in southeast Missouri, USA, showing geology of the Southeast Missouri Ore District. In the Viburnum<br />

Trend, several deposits formed in the reef facies of the Bonneterre Dolomite, and ore-bearing solutions appear to have migrated up from the<br />

Lamotte Sandstone. (from Kaiser et al. 1987). 2 = Lithostratigraphy of the Ozark Dome region; 3 = Hydrostratigraphy of the Ozark Dome<br />

region: 1 = the basal sandstone-carbonate Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer, with “high-permeability lenses” within it, rested on fractured<br />

Precambrian basement; 2 = less permeable Ordovician carbonates and shale; 3 = Permian shale (Adapted from Garven et al., 1999). Note<br />

similarity of litho- and hydrostratigraphy on these sections with those of the speleogenesis model of Brod (1964) (see Figure 39)<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!