Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IMPLICATIONS OF HYPOGENIC TRANSVERSE SPELEOGENESIS<br />
the hypogene karst concept presented in this book, it can<br />
be easily seen that these conditions are associated with<br />
confined transverse speleogenesis and are largely created<br />
by it.<br />
At the regional scale, nearly horizontal flow mostly<br />
occurs in the basal aquifer (Lamotte and Bonneterre<br />
Formations), which is confined by the thin Davis Shale.<br />
The hydrostratigraphy is shown in part 3 of Figure 60. The<br />
main deposits are aerially associated with a highpermeability<br />
lens, the Viburnum Trend, which is 20 km<br />
wide and about 100 km long. It is situated over the<br />
basement arch, but where the topographic elevations are<br />
the lowest. The Viburnum Trend affects regional flow<br />
patterns, creates a large discharge zone and focuses flow<br />
upon it, and induces a hydrothermal anomaly. Ore<br />
mineralization patterns at the deposit-scale are controlled<br />
by sandstone pinchouts, karstic channels and breccia zones<br />
(which are also karstic channels in this case).<br />
It is beyond the scope of this paper to offer an<br />
elaborate speleogenetic/ore origin conceptual model for<br />
MVT deposits of the Ozark Dome, but the hydrogeologic<br />
conditions described above seem to be generally favorable<br />
for hypogene speleogenesis, which could be a major factor<br />
in the formation of ores:<br />
In the basal aquifer system regional lateral flow of<br />
brines occurred mainly through sandstone units, with<br />
unkarstified carbonate strata serving as intervening beds.<br />
The Ozark Dome area and local pinchouts of the basal<br />
sandstone within it were favorable sites for transverse<br />
speleogenesis to commence through the overlying<br />
carbonate Bonnetere Formation, due to the combined<br />
ascending potential of both the regional topography-driven<br />
flow system and local thermal anomalies induced by the<br />
direct rise of hot fluids from fractured Precambrian<br />
basement into the carbonates.<br />
Multiple dissolution mechanisms for speleogenesis<br />
could operate; various mixing effects (particularly invoked<br />
in these settings), dissolution due to increased calcite<br />
solubility in cooling hydrothermal paths, sulfuric acid,<br />
dedolomitization, etc. (see Section 3.6); this should be the<br />
subject of a separate region- and deposit-specific analysis.<br />
Transverse speleogenesis changed vertical permeability<br />
and opened migration paths across carbonate units and the<br />
confining bed (through fracturing and collapsing in<br />
response to growing cave porosity below), enhancing flow<br />
and regional discharge and inducing various reactions at<br />
geochemical thresholds that commonly occur along crossformational<br />
paths. Some of these thresholds could favor<br />
ore deposition in previously created karst porosity at some<br />
stages.<br />
Fluid migration, speleogenesis and ore deposition were<br />
transient processes, adapting to the regional dynamics of<br />
landscape evolution as well as to deposit-scale dynamics of<br />
porosity and permeability changes. A number of<br />
geochemical models for ore formation can be adapted to fit<br />
the above hydrogeologic/speleogenetic scheme.<br />
Figure 60. 1 = Geologic section A–A’ in southeast Missouri, USA, showing geology of the Southeast Missouri Ore District. In the Viburnum<br />
Trend, several deposits formed in the reef facies of the Bonneterre Dolomite, and ore-bearing solutions appear to have migrated up from the<br />
Lamotte Sandstone. (from Kaiser et al. 1987). 2 = Lithostratigraphy of the Ozark Dome region; 3 = Hydrostratigraphy of the Ozark Dome<br />
region: 1 = the basal sandstone-carbonate Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer, with “high-permeability lenses” within it, rested on fractured<br />
Precambrian basement; 2 = less permeable Ordovician carbonates and shale; 3 = Permian shale (Adapted from Garven et al., 1999). Note<br />
similarity of litho- and hydrostratigraphy on these sections with those of the speleogenesis model of Brod (1964) (see Figure 39)<br />
93