03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HYPOGENIC CAVE FEATURES<br />

isolated steeply ascending passages or clusters of rift-like<br />

passages connecting to some master level, and prominent<br />

outlet segments rising from the bulk of passages and rooms<br />

(Figure 17). These structures are composed of network and<br />

spongework mazes at various levels, coalescing with large<br />

chambers and passages and connected through rising<br />

vertical conduits. Other examples include the Monte Cucco<br />

system in Italy (Figure 24); complex bush-like upwardbranching<br />

structures of hydrothermal caves in the Buda<br />

Hills, Hungary, composed of rising sequences of chambers<br />

and large spherical cupolas (Figure 22, B and C;<br />

Dubljansky Ju, 2000b); and network maze clusters at the<br />

base of the Joachim Dolomite in eastern Missouri, USA,<br />

with ascending staircase limbs of vertical pits and subhorizontal<br />

passages (outlet component; Brod, 1964; Figure<br />

39).<br />

Multi-story mazes are variants of complex 3-D<br />

patterns. In a typical system, lower stories or individual<br />

rising conduits are recharge elements to a cave system.<br />

Master stories develop at intermediate elevations where<br />

there are laterally connected fracture systems. Upper<br />

stories serve as outflow structures (“outflow mazes” of<br />

Ford, 1989). Small patches of maze or lateral extensions of<br />

high cupola structures may develop at higher or highest<br />

elevations without bearing outflow functions<br />

(“adventitious” mazes of Ford), especially in systems<br />

where buoyancy flow plays a role.<br />

In summary, the 3-D structure of hypogenic caves is<br />

controlled mainly by the distribution of initial permeability<br />

structures across the cave formation and adjacent<br />

formations, interaction of different permeability structures<br />

at various levels, and overall recharge/discharge<br />

conditions. Geochemical interaction of flow systems<br />

guided by transverse and lateral permeability pathways<br />

also may play a significant role. Buoyancy effects in free<br />

convection and mixed systems can also be important in<br />

creating complex cave structures.<br />

4.3 The maze caves controversy<br />

The most common (although not the only) pattern for<br />

hypogenic transverse speleogenesis is a network maze.<br />

Network mazes, often with several superimposed stories,<br />

constitute entire caves or parts of complex cave structures.<br />

The formation of maze cave patterns has been<br />

specifically addressed in the karst literature for many<br />

years. Researchers who previously attributed the origin of<br />

maze caves to artesian conditions (e.g. Howard, 1964;<br />

White, 1969; Ford, 1971; Huntoon, 2000) or disregarded<br />

this possibility (Palmer, 1975, 1991, 2000b) implied the<br />

“classical” concept of lateral artesian flow through a<br />

soluble unit. Palmer examined the hydraulic-kinetic<br />

conditions within a simple loop in which water diverges<br />

into two branches that rejoin downstream, and showed that<br />

these branches cannot develop at comparable rates except<br />

at very high discharge to flow length (Q/L) ratios. Such<br />

conditions are not characteristic of lateral artesian flow, so<br />

he concluded that slow groundwater flow near chemical<br />

equilibrium, typical of confined aquifers, is least likely to<br />

produce maze caves (Palmer, 1975; 1991, 2000a).<br />

White (1969) described the type of a “sandwich<br />

aquifer”, where a thin carbonate unit is overlain and<br />

underlain by insoluble strata. He noted that network caves<br />

are characteristic for this situation and pointed out that<br />

such patterns form due to the lack of concentrated recharge<br />

from overlying beds.<br />

Palmer (1975) specifically addressed the problem of<br />

maze patterns and suggested two main settings favorable<br />

for their development:<br />

1) High-discharge or high-gradient flow during floods in<br />

the vicinity of constrictions in the main stream passages<br />

(floodwater mazes) and,<br />

2) Diffuse recharge to a carbonate unit through a<br />

permeable but insoluble caprock such as quartz sandstone.<br />

Figure 17. Profile of Lechuguilla Cave, NM, USA, by National Park Service volunteers, courtesy of US National Park Service. The cave is<br />

currently surveyed at 193.4 km in length and 490 m in depth. This is an example of a complex 3-D structure, in which some prominent inlet<br />

(feeding) and outlet components are easily recognizable.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!