03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HYPOGENIC CAVE FEATURES<br />

4.5 Selected examples of caves formed by<br />

hypogenic transverse speleogenesis<br />

In this section, a brief overview is provided of some<br />

exemplary caves for which hypogene transverse origin is<br />

firmly established or suspected based on available<br />

publications and personal observations by the author. Not<br />

all of them have been previously interpreted in this way,<br />

but their morphological and geological characteristics,<br />

consistent with the criteria discussed above, strongly<br />

suggest their development by rising flow in confined<br />

settings.<br />

In no way should this overview be considered as<br />

exhaustive for hypogenic caves. The number of such caves<br />

recognized around the world is rapidly growing, and it is<br />

going to expand dramatically by re-interpretation of many<br />

caves, based on the new approach suggested in this book.<br />

Rather, this is a list of reference cases to use in relating,<br />

refining or revising the origin of a great number of caves in<br />

many regions, and an illustration of the variety of<br />

geographic and geologic settings in which ascending<br />

hypogenic speleogenesis occurs.<br />

Central and Western Europe<br />

Hypogenic transverse caves are abundant throughout<br />

Central and Western Europe, occurring in both cratonic<br />

and disrupted (folded) settings.<br />

Probably the most well known and early recognized as<br />

hypogenic (hydrothermal) are caves in the Buda<br />

Mountains, Hungary (e.g. Müller and Sarvary, 1977. There<br />

is abundant literature on Hungarian hydrothermal caves,<br />

summarized in Takács-Bolner and Kraus (1989) and<br />

Dublyansky, Yu. (1995, 2000c). Triassic cherty limestones<br />

are overlain by 40-60 m of Eocene limestones covered by<br />

marls that form a largely impermeable cap. Denudation<br />

and fluvial erosion imposed over the complex block-fault<br />

geologic structure created various situations of breaching<br />

and draining of the cave-hosting limestones. Mean<br />

temperatures of descending waters invading the caves are<br />

8-13 o C. Different thermal springs have mean temperatures<br />

between 20-60 o C, indicating that differing amounts of<br />

mixing take place (Ford and Williams, 2007). Almost the<br />

full range of thermal cave types and evolutionary stages of<br />

development can be found in Budapest, including 2-D and<br />

3-D mazes, relict shafts, chambers, and modern caves<br />

discharging rising thermal waters at the level of the<br />

Danube River.<br />

Ford and Williams (2007) refer to a series of<br />

illustrative examples of the Buda Mountains caves.<br />

Pálvölgyi (Figure 22, A) and Ferenc-hegy caves are multistory<br />

mazes. Szemlöhegy Cave is a more simple outlet rift<br />

from along joints; it has abundant subaqueous calcite<br />

crusts. Molnár János is a modern outlet; its warm waters<br />

have been dove to -70 m, discovering ~4 km of maze at<br />

depth. Jószefhegy Cave is a shaft descending to ramiform<br />

chambers with abundant secondary gypsum deposits,<br />

where Ford and Williams (2007) point out that CO2<br />

(hydrothermal) and H2S dissolution mechanisms may<br />

mingle within a small geographical area.<br />

Sátorkö-puszta Cave and Bátori Cave (Figure 22, B)<br />

are examples of basal chambers with a tree-like branching<br />

pattern of rising passages containing sequences of<br />

spherical cupolas. These passages extend for about 40 m<br />

above the chamber in Sátorkö-puszta. The origin of<br />

cupolas had been attributed earlier to the convectional<br />

condensation mechanism operating above the water table<br />

(Szunyogh, 1989). The chamber walls are largely<br />

converted to gypsum. Ford and Williams (2007) believe<br />

these caves are monogenetic H2S systems, major<br />

enlargements by H2S processes of earlier rising water<br />

shafts.<br />

Figure 22. Patterns of hydrothermal caves of the Buda Mountains, Hungary. A = maze pattern, plan view of Pálvölgyi Cave (by J. Kárpát<br />

and K. Takácsne-Bolner); B = bush-like patterns, 1 = profile of Sátorkö-puszta Cave (by M. Juhasz), 2 = profile of Bátori Cave (by P. Borka<br />

and J. Kárpát). From Dublyansky Yu. (2000c).<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!