Fair Trade: Overview, Impact, Challenges - Are you looking for one ...
Fair Trade: Overview, Impact, Challenges - Are you looking for one ...
Fair Trade: Overview, Impact, Challenges - Are you looking for one ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28<br />
<strong>Fair</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>: <strong>Overview</strong>, <strong>Impact</strong>, <strong>Challenges</strong><br />
♦ What is the poverty profile of the target group?<br />
♦ How viable are the existing institutional models <strong>for</strong> fair trade compared with the<br />
possible alternatives?<br />
In practice this methodology proved difficult to apply mainly because of a lack of data<br />
and within the resource constraints of the case study. A further reason was the<br />
difficulty of drawing a distinction between the FT and mainstream marketing chains<br />
at the farmer and farmer organisation level, since only a small proportion of the sales<br />
of producer organisations took place on FT terms.<br />
The key features of the organisations focused on in the case studies were the<br />
following. The Ghana cocoa case study concentrated on Kuapa Kokoo Limited<br />
(KKL) which was <strong>for</strong>med in 1993 and became a cooperative in 1996 as Kuapa Kokoo<br />
Union (KKU). In 1999 KKU had 462 member societies, representing more than<br />
30,000 farmers. Technical assistance was provided by TWIN and other FT<br />
organisations with DFID support to assist in building KKU’s capacity. Kuapa Kokoo<br />
is the only source of FT cocoa in Ghana, the only major cocoa producer cooperative,<br />
and has generally provided almost two-thirds of the international supply of FT<br />
labelled cocoa. Initially FT sales amounted to up to 15% of KKU’s total sales.<br />
However, FT sales have been stagnant (between 300 and 600 tonnes per year) while<br />
KKU’s total sales have grown to around 18,000 tonnes. FT sales currently account <strong>for</strong><br />
around 2% of KKU sales. Only a small proportion of the price premium on fairly<br />
traded cocoa sourced from Kuapa Kokoo has been paid out to farmers. The majority<br />
is paid into the Kuapa Kokoo Farmers' Trust which is used to fund community<br />
development projects.<br />
The Tanzania study focused on cooperative unions supplying FT coffee. In contrast<br />
to the Ghana case, the Tanzanian cooperatives were long-established organisations<br />
that had played a pivotal role under the state controlled marketing system. They have<br />
faced increasingly intense competition from private trade as the market has been<br />
liberalised. FT organisations have been buying coffee from Tanzania via parastatals<br />
since the 1970s. Since direct purchase became possible in the early 1990s, a range of<br />
European, North American and Japanese FT organisations have bought coffee from<br />
four Tanzanian cooperatives.<br />
The main conclusions of the case studies about the impact of the FT initiatives<br />
examined are:<br />
♦ The quantities of product designated as FT (i.e. attracting the price premium) were<br />
modest and represented only a small fraction of the total quantity sold by the<br />
producer organisation, although FT cocoa did provide an initially important<br />
market <strong>for</strong> Kuapa Kokoo. It was there<strong>for</strong>e not meaningful to separate at the<br />
producer level the impacts of the FT and non-FT aspects of the producer<br />
organisation’s activities. The only difference at the farmer level was the payment<br />
of the premium and this was not passed on to producers so it had no impact on<br />
production incentives.<br />
♦ In each case, the effectiveness of producer control and the transparency of<br />
management <strong>for</strong> the cooperatives and cooperative unions will be a key issue<br />
<strong>for</strong> the future operation of the marketing system. The m<strong>one</strong>y from the price