10.08.2013 Views

Metrolink peer review report - Ventura County Star

Metrolink peer review report - Ventura County Star

Metrolink peer review report - Ventura County Star

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

METROLINK COMMUTER RAIL SAFETY PEER REVIEW PANEL<br />

Final Report – January 5, 2009<br />

Issue Papers<br />

There is a need for the staff to spend more time overseeing turnaround maintenance at the six to seven outlying<br />

points where layover maintenance, cleaning, toilet dumping, etc. is performed. Currently this oversight is<br />

provided by one of the compliance officers at CMF. These facilities are located at:<br />

• Lancaster - end of Antelope Valley Line<br />

• Montalvo - end of <strong>Ventura</strong> Line<br />

• Moorpark - on <strong>Ventura</strong> Line<br />

• San Bernardino – end of San Bernardino Line<br />

• Riverside, North Side<br />

• Riverside, South Side<br />

• Oceanside – This facility is in San Diego and is operated by Coaster (North <strong>County</strong> Transit District).<br />

The contractor assigns the senior technician at each of these sites to general supervision. A senior supervisor<br />

rotates among the different sites to conduct employee oversight.<br />

In order to oversee performance of the maintenance contractor properly with the current fleet of equipment, at<br />

least three or four compliance officers are needed. Currently there are two compliance officers. Of those, one has<br />

additional responsibilities, and is also training the second. As the fleet expands, additional compliance officers<br />

will be needed.<br />

The equipment department has developed equipment training programs and guides for training the operating<br />

personnel on the rail equipment and how to handle on-line problems (such as cutting out a door engine or a<br />

traction motor, and determining if the correct one has been cut out -- all in accordance with CFR Title 49, Part<br />

238), but these have not generally been used. We encountered among the equipment staff an observation that<br />

transportation staff (i.e., train engineers) does not know how to use the equipment optimally; correspondingly,<br />

when there is an on-line failure; the train crew often does not know how to physically isolate the problem under<br />

guidance from the dispatcher.<br />

At present, it appears that there is not a fully defined and effective QMP position established at the dispatching<br />

center or elsewhere that can be contacted in case of on-line failures or malfunctions. In some cases, a decision<br />

needs to be made regarding the equipment failure and the safe operation or recall of the equipment. The FRA<br />

identifies the QMP as the person who makes safety critical decisions as to how, or if, equipment may continue in<br />

revenue service with running gear defects. Without the proper identification of operating components that may<br />

not be working properly, properly, safety decisions about the continued movement of that equipment are<br />

hampered.<br />

Regarding document control, while the active files appear to contain) maintenance records for the past four years;<br />

it is not known how the older documents are handled. Certainly all documents should be scanned and placed into<br />

PDF, or archived in some other electronic format, shortly after being generated and archived.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!