10.08.2013 Views

Volume 1, Draft Civil Code - Digital exhibitions & collections - McGill ...

Volume 1, Draft Civil Code - Digital exhibitions & collections - McGill ...

Volume 1, Draft Civil Code - Digital exhibitions & collections - McGill ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOREWORD<br />

XXIII<br />

To the many who have followed the work of the <strong>Civil</strong><br />

<strong>Code</strong> Revision Office, the <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Code</strong> will come as<br />

something neither entirely new nor completely familiar.<br />

Its broad outlines have become apparent with the<br />

publication, commencing in 1966, of the reports of the various<br />

Committees entrusted with the revision of each of the subjectmatters<br />

covered by the <strong>Code</strong>.<br />

However, the unavoidable division of the task inevitably<br />

resulted in all too great a distortion of a work requiring<br />

cohesion and unity. But now the pieces have been brought<br />

together, the unorganized has been put in order and the<br />

scattered has been assembled.<br />

I - The aims<br />

When the legislature decided in 1955 to proceed with<br />

the revision of the <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Code</strong>, it confined itself to a brief<br />

statement of the general terms of reference within which the<br />

jurist appointed was to work. In so doing, it did not lay down<br />

the lines along which the revision was to be carried out and the<br />

direction the work was to take and, consequently, it did not<br />

indicate its scope. Was it a question of simply making quick<br />

and partial improvements where changes were most urgently<br />

needed? The contrary view was taken, in the belief that all the<br />

basic institutions of our civil law should undergo a collective<br />

and systematic rethinking.<br />

What the revision should consist of, and what we strove<br />

for, cannot be more aptly expressed than it was by Professor<br />

Andre Tunc when he wrote (1): "II ne s'agit pas de tout<br />

bouleverser, mais de tout revoir; de se demander loyalement<br />

devant ces phenomenes nouveaux et aussi devant les transformations<br />

techniques etpsychologiques de la societe, ce qui, dans<br />

FAncien, garde sa force et, parfois, sa vertu, et ce qui gene

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!