10.08.2013 Views

Valeurs seuils pour le rapport coût-efficacité en soins de santé - KCE

Valeurs seuils pour le rapport coût-efficacité en soins de santé - KCE

Valeurs seuils pour le rapport coût-efficacité en soins de santé - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 ICER Thresholds <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 100<br />

102. Williams A. Is the QALY a technical solution to a political prob<strong>le</strong>m? Of course not! Int J Health<br />

Serv. 1991;21(2):365-9; discussion 71-2.<br />

103. Baltuss<strong>en</strong> R, t<strong>en</strong> Asbroek AH, Koolman X, Shrestha N, Bhattarai P, Niess<strong>en</strong> LW. Priority<br />

setting using multip<strong>le</strong> criteria: should a lung health programme be imp<strong>le</strong>m<strong>en</strong>ted in Nepal?<br />

Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(3):178-85.<br />

104. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: princip<strong>le</strong>s, practice and chal<strong>le</strong>nges. Cost<br />

Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2(1):3.<br />

105. Gibson J, Mitton C, Martin D, Donaldson C, Singer P. Ethics and economics: does programme<br />

budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting? J Health Serv Res Policy.<br />

2006;11(1):32-7.<br />

106. Nord E, Richardson J, Street A, Kuhse H, Singer P. Maximizing health b<strong>en</strong>efits vs egalitarianism:<br />

an Australian survey of health issues. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1429-37.<br />

107. Dolan P, Cookson R. A qualitative study of the ext<strong>en</strong>t to which health gain matters wh<strong>en</strong><br />

choosing betwe<strong>en</strong> groups of pati<strong>en</strong>ts. Health Policy. 2000;51(1):19-30.<br />

108. K<strong>le</strong>vit HD, Bates AC, Castanares T, Kirk EP, Sipes-Metz<strong>le</strong>r PR, Wopat R. Prioritization of<br />

health care services. A progress report by the Oregon Health Services Commission. Arch<br />

Intern Med. 1991;151(5):912-6.<br />

109. Al<strong>le</strong>n D, Lee RH, Lowson K. The use of QALYS (quality-adjusted life years) in health service<br />

planning. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1989;4(4):261-73.<br />

110. Eddy DM. Oregon's methods. Did cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess analysis fail? JAMA. 1991;266(15):2135-41.<br />

111. Drummond M, Brown R, F<strong>en</strong>drick AM, Ful<strong>le</strong>rton P, Neumann P, Taylor R, et al. Use of<br />

pharmacoeconomics information--report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of<br />

pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care <strong>de</strong>cision making. Value Health.<br />

2003;6(4):407-16.<br />

112. Hoffmann C, Graf von <strong>de</strong>r Schu<strong>le</strong>nburg JM. The influ<strong>en</strong>ce of economic evaluation studies on<br />

<strong>de</strong>cision making. A European survey. The EUROMET group. Health Policy. 2000;52(3):179-92.<br />

113. Williams A. QALYS and ethics: a health economist's perspective. Soc Sci Med.<br />

1996;43(12):1795-804.<br />

114. Grosse SD, Teutsch SM, Haddix AC. Lessons from cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess research for United<br />

States public health policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:365-91.<br />

115. Williams I, Bryan S, McIver S. How should cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess analysis be used in health<br />

technology coverage <strong>de</strong>cisions? Evid<strong>en</strong>ce from the National Institute for Health and Clinical<br />

Excel<strong>le</strong>nce approach. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(2):73-9.<br />

116. Simon HA. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision making Processes in Administrative<br />

Organizations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1976.<br />

117. March JG, Ols<strong>en</strong> JP. Organizational <strong>le</strong>arning and the ambiguity of the past. . In: March JG, Ols<strong>en</strong><br />

JP, editors. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. 2nd ed. Berg<strong>en</strong>, Norway:<br />

118.<br />

Universitatsforlaget; 1987.<br />

Lindblom CE. The Sci<strong>en</strong>ce of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review. 1959;19(2):79-<br />

88.<br />

119. Elliott H, Popay J. How are policy makers using evid<strong>en</strong>ce? Mo<strong>de</strong>ls of research utilisation and<br />

local NHS policy making. J Epi<strong>de</strong>miol Community Health. 2000;54(6):461-8.<br />

120. Davis P, Howd<strong>en</strong>-Chapman P. Translating research findings into health policy. Soc Sci Med.<br />

1996;43(5):865-72.<br />

121. Kothari A, Birch S, Char<strong>le</strong>s C. "Interaction" and research utilisation in health policies and<br />

programs: does it work? Health Policy. 2005;71(1):117-25.<br />

122. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of<br />

evid<strong>en</strong>ce: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239-44.<br />

123. Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK. Assessing country-<strong>le</strong>vel efforts to link research<br />

to action. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(8):620-8.<br />

124. Mi<strong>le</strong>wa T, Barry C. Health Policy and the Politics of Evid<strong>en</strong>ce. Social Policy and Administration.<br />

2005;39(5):498-512.<br />

125. Eich<strong>le</strong>r HG, Kong SX, Gerth WC, Mavros P, Jonsson B. Use of cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess analysis in<br />

health-care resource allocation <strong>de</strong>cision making: how are cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess thresholds<br />

expected to emerge? Value Health. 2004;7(5):518-28.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!