10.08.2013 Views

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 Plasma <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 120<br />

Th<strong>is</strong> number of units collected and testes must be justified by the <strong>in</strong>voices relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

these tests and certified by an <strong>in</strong>ternal or external auditor. <strong>The</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itive balance of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>is</strong> calculated follow<strong>in</strong>g the subm<strong>is</strong>sion of the support<strong>in</strong>g documents, which<br />

are sent to the Federal Agency for Medic<strong>in</strong>es and Health Products. In 2007, a sum of<br />

14.00 EUR was paid for each test actually conducted. <strong>The</strong> Royal Decree states that the<br />

subsidies granted can under no circumstances exceed the real costs <strong>in</strong>curred.<br />

<strong>The</strong> remuneration procedure def<strong>in</strong>ed for the NAT test licence <strong>is</strong> as follows: systematic<br />

collection of royalties for the test manufacturer - reflect<strong>in</strong>g the number of usable<br />

results; for example if a s<strong>in</strong>gle test <strong>is</strong> used for 10 pouches of blood (pool test<strong>in</strong>g), the<br />

number of royalties will be equal to ten although only one test has been used if negative<br />

result). In addition, the subsidy depends on the number of units successfully collected<br />

and the number of tests certified <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>voice. As mentioned above, these are l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />

the number of usable results and not necessarily to the number of units used as<br />

reagents. Th<strong>is</strong> means that if a pool<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>is</strong> used (which seems to be the case for<br />

the Red Cross), the amount of the subsidies may be d<strong>is</strong>sociated from the number of<br />

reagents purchased. For the Red Cross, the system of pool test<strong>in</strong>g may lead to a sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> manpower.<br />

Key po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

• <strong>The</strong> collectors of whole blood receive a specific subsidy for the NAT tests to<br />

detect HIV1 and HCV<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Red Cross uses a system of pool<strong>in</strong>g to carry out these tests, likely sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> manpower<br />

• <strong>The</strong> firm sell<strong>in</strong>g these tests receives royalties <strong>in</strong> function of the number of<br />

usable tests (not necessarily of the number of tests carried out)<br />

2.1.2.6 Cost of plasmapheres<strong>is</strong><br />

Year<br />

We found the costs associated <strong>with</strong> the collection of plasma from plasmaphaeres<strong>is</strong> <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal SFS <strong>report</strong>. Unfortunately, we did not have the opportunity to consult the<br />

same <strong>report</strong>s for the VDB.<br />

Table 7: Costs SFS associated <strong>with</strong> the collection of 1 liter plasma from<br />

plasmapheres<strong>is</strong><br />

Donor<br />

manag<br />

Direct cost Organ<strong>is</strong>ation<br />

Total<br />

Total<br />

Collection Labo D<strong>is</strong>tribution<br />

costs<br />

direct<br />

1997 2.68 49.75 15.39 1.64 69.46 20.62 90.08<br />

1998 4.04 50.25 13.76 0.77 68.82 17.75 86.57<br />

1999 4.66 52.11 17.07 0.77 74.61 20.97 95.58<br />

2000 5.97 53.69 15.02 0.92 75.60 20.15 95.75<br />

2001 7.09 62.32 16.19 1.19 86.79 23.19 109.98<br />

2002 3.37 65.49 19.03 1.37 89.26 17.94 107.20<br />

2003 5.22 67.62 27.10 1.35 101.29 16.92 118.21<br />

2004 7.53 67.29 27.30 1.06 103.18 24.79 127.97<br />

2005 8.73 67.56 27.28 1.33 104.90 26.96 131.86<br />

2006 10.25 72.72 28.85 1.42 113.24 31.40 144.64<br />

2007 9.12 78.51 29.26 1.25 118.14 35.37 153.51<br />

(Source: SFS – <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>report</strong>s)<br />

If we subtract the subsidies from the total costs, we can compare the SFS net cost to<br />

the price received.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!