13.08.2013 Views

A record of the descendants of John Clark, of Farmington, Conn ...

A record of the descendants of John Clark, of Farmington, Conn ...

A record of the descendants of John Clark, of Farmington, Conn ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 CLARK GENEALOGY.<br />

JOHN CLARK OF HARTFORD.<br />

He was a soldier in <strong>the</strong> Pequot fight and must have been<br />

in Hartford as early as 1637. On <strong>the</strong> first day <strong>of</strong> May, 1637,<br />

<strong>the</strong> General Court at Hartford " ordered that <strong>the</strong>re shall be<br />

an <strong>of</strong>lfensive war against <strong>the</strong> Pequoitt." After <strong>the</strong> return <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> soldiers from <strong>the</strong>ir successful campaign, a tract <strong>of</strong> land<br />

containing from sixty to eighty acres, long known as Soldiers<br />

Fields was divided among <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Clark</strong> was an owner<br />

<strong>of</strong> land in this tract, and <strong>the</strong>refore presumably one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

soldiers in <strong>the</strong> Pequot fight. On <strong>the</strong> 9th <strong>of</strong> March, 1641, <strong>the</strong><br />

town ordered Mat<strong>the</strong>w Marvin to maintain a fence ....<br />

"<br />

to <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Clark</strong>'s lot lying in <strong>the</strong> soldiers<br />

field."*<br />

Also land is <strong>record</strong>ed as owned by Zachariah Field, June<br />

9, 1659, viz., " one parcel lying in <strong>the</strong> Soldier's Field which<br />

he bought <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Clark</strong> containing by estimation one Rood."<br />

At a General Meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town held <strong>the</strong> 14th <strong>of</strong> Janu-<br />

ary 1639, it was voted " Whereas <strong>the</strong>re is some difference in<br />

allotments, some having more than is according to <strong>the</strong>ir due<br />

proportion, it is <strong>the</strong>refore ordered that Mr. Hopkins, Mr.<br />

Wells, Mr. Warner, <strong>John</strong> Pratt, Timothy Standly, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Clark</strong>,<br />

Joseph Mygatt .... shall examine <strong>the</strong> same and shall have<br />

power to appoint every mans portion according as in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

judgment shall be just and equal."<br />

I find no <strong>record</strong> <strong>of</strong> any deeds <strong>of</strong> land executed by <strong>John</strong><br />

<strong>Clark</strong>. It was <strong>the</strong> early custom in Hartford and o<strong>the</strong>r towns<br />

to <strong>record</strong> a description <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> pieces <strong>of</strong> land owned by each<br />

man in one place in <strong>the</strong> <strong>record</strong>, but not to <strong>record</strong> deeds <strong>of</strong><br />

conveyance at length.<br />

o-ins as follows—<br />

The <strong>record</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Clark</strong>'s land be-<br />

See also Hartford in <strong>the</strong> Olden Time,<br />

I. W. Stuart, p. 110.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!