Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5-4. Precision Ranges for Total Mercury Measurements at Sites #1 and #2 (February 2007) .............................................................................................................................5-7 Table 5-5. Precision Ranges for Total Mercury Measurements at Sites #1 and #2 (October 2008) .............................................................................................................................5-7 Table 5-6. Precision ranges for Dimethyl Mercury Measurements for Sites #1 and #2..............5-8 Table 5-7. Precision Ranges for Monomethyl Mercury Measurements for Sites #1 and #2.......5-8 Table 5-8. Precision ranges for Method 25-C Measurements at Sites #1 and #2 ........................5-9 Table 5-9. Precision ranges for GC/FID/TCD Measurements at Sites #1 and #2 .......................5-9 Table B-1. Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the Boreal OP-TDLAS in the Control Cell VRPM Survey at Site #1.............................B-1 Table B-2. Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the IMACC OP-FTIR in the Control Cell VRPM Survey at Site #1. .............................B-1 Table B-4 Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the IMACC OP-FTIR in the Bioreactor cell VRPM Survey at Site #1...........................B-2 Table B-5. Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the Boreal OP-TDLAS in the Bioreactor cell VRPM Survey at Site #2.........................B-3 Table B-6 Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the IMACC OP-FTIR in the Bioreactor cell VRPM Survey at Site #2..........................B-3 Table B-7. Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the Boreal OP-TDLAS in the Control Cell VRPM Survey at Site #2............................B-4 Table B-8. Distance, and Horizontal and Vertical Coordinates of Mirrors Used by the IMACC OP-FTIR in the Control Cell VRPM Survey at Site #2. ............................B-4 Table C-1. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found Along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #1 .............................................................C-1 Table C-2. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found Along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #1 .............................................................C-2 Table C-3. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found Along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #1 .............................................................C-3 Table C-4. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found Along the Southern Beam Path in the Control Cell of Site #1 ...............................................................................................C-4 Table C-5. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 22 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #1.............................................C-5 viii
Table C-6. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 22 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #1..............................................C-6 Table C-7. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 22 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #1..............................................C-7 Table C-8. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 22 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #1..............................................C-8 Table C-9. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2..................................................C-9 Table C-10. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-10 Table C-11. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-11 Table C-12. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-12 Table C-13. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 25 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-13 Table C-14. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 25 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-14 Table C-15. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 25 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-15 Table C-16. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 25 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2.................................................C-16 Table C-17. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 23 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2............................................C-17 Table C-18. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 23 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2.............................................C-18 Table C-19. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 23 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2.............................................C-19 Table C-20. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 23 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2.............................................C-19 Table C-21. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2.............................................C-20 Table C-22. Methane Concentrations (in PPM) Found on February 24 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor cell of Site #2.............................................C-20 ix
Page 1 and 2: Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill G
Page 3 and 4: Foreword The U.S. Environmental Pro
Page 5 and 6: 3.1.3 Total Site Methane Emissions
Page 7 and 8: List of Tables Table 1-1. Target Co
Page 9: Table 3-28. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 13 and 14: List of Figures Figure 1-1. Map of
Page 15 and 16: Executive Summary Waste decompositi
Page 17 and 18: This page intentionally left blank.
Page 19 and 20: instrument (IMACC, Inc.). Figures 1
Page 21 and 22: Figure 1-3. Scanning Boreal GasFind
Page 23 and 24: wind direction data are collected n
Page 25 and 26: adsorption spectrometer. The analyz
Page 27 and 28: Table 1-2. Schedule of Work Perform
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2-2. Detail of measurement c
Page 31 and 32: corners of the cell, respectively.
Page 33 and 34: 2.2.3 Background Measurements Backg
Page 35 and 36: This page intentionally left blank.
Page 37 and 38: was aligned on the mirror targets i
Page 39 and 40: methane concentrations measured alo
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3-3 Summary of ORS measureme
Page 43 and 44: Table 3-5. Calculated methane flux
Page 45 and 46: Table 3-7. Calculated methane flux
Page 47 and 48: cell to the base. The following equ
Page 49 and 50: Table 3-9. Results of TO-15 analysi
Page 51 and 52: Table 3-10. Results of C1 to C6 and
Page 53 and 54: Table 3-14. Monomethyl Mercury Conc
Page 55 and 56: 3.2 Landfill Site #2 3.2.1 Control
Page 57 and 58: Table 3-17. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 59 and 60: Table 3-19. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3-20. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.2 Bioreactor Cell 3.2.2.1 Febru
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Based on the calculations presented
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3-34. Results for C1 to C6 an
Page 73 and 74:
Table 3-38. Monomethyl Mercury Conc
Page 75 and 76:
3.3 Gas and Mercury Sampling Result
Page 77 and 78:
Site #1 with a level of 83 ppmv. Th
Page 79 and 80:
The surveys also found significant
Page 81 and 82:
Monomethyl mercury concentrations i
Page 83 and 84:
5.1 Equipment Calibration Chapter 5
Page 85 and 86:
The R 2 value was used to assess th
Page 87 and 88:
the measured path-integrated methan
Page 89 and 90:
5.2.7 DQI Check of Total Mercury Sa
Page 91 and 92:
Site #1 5.4 Site #2 77.9 Completene
Page 93 and 94:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 95 and 96:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agenc
Page 97 and 98:
d f e c b PDCs Y X a 2 12( y)( z) (
Page 99 and 100:
When the VRPM configuration consist
Page 101 and 102:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 103 and 104:
Table B-3. Distance, and Horizontal
Page 105 and 106:
Table B-7. Distance, and Horizontal
Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX C Path-Averaged Methane Co
Page 109 and 110:
Table C-3. Methane Concentrations (
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Table C-11. Methane Concentrations
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
show all

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?