Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3-16. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-21 Table 3-17. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-22 Table 3-18. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-23 Table 3-19. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-24 Table 3-20. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 25 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-26 Table 3-21. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 25 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-26 Table 3-22. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 25 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-27 Table 3-23. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 25 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Control Cell of Site #2 .........................................................................................................................3-27 Table 3-24. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 23 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-29 Table 3-25. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 23 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-29 Table 3-26. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 23 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-30 Table 3-27. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 23 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-30 vi
Table 3-28. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Northern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-32 Table 3-29. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Eastern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-32 Table 3-30. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Southern VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-32 Table 3-31. Calculated Methane Flux and Prevailing Wind Speed and Direction Measured on February 24 along the Western VRPM Configuration in the Bioreactor Cell of Site #2.....................................................................................................................3-33 Table 3-32. Summary of Total Site Methane Emissions Calculations from Site #2 ...................3-33 Table 3-33. Results for TO-15 Analysis from Site #2 ..................................................................3-34 Table 3-34. Results for C1 to C6 and Permanent Gases by GC/FID/TCD from Site #2.............3-36 Table 3-35. Results for Method 25-C Analysis from Site #2 .......................................................3-36 Table 3-36. Total Mercury Sample Concentrations from Site #2 ................................................3-37 Table 3-37. Dimethyl Mercury Sample Concentrations from Site #2..........................................3-37 Table 3-38. Monomethyl Mercury Concentrations (ng/m 3 ) from Site #2....................................3-38 Table 3-39. Estimated NMOC Flux Values from the Control and Bioreactor Cells of Site #2 ..3-39 Table 3-40. Total Mercury Concentrations Measured at Site #1 during the October 2007 Field Campaign ..........................................................................................................3-40 Table 3-41. Total Mercury Concentrations Measured at Site #2 during the October 2007 Field Campaign ..........................................................................................................3-41 Table 3-42. Landfill Gas Composition Data Collected at Sites #1 and #2 during the October 2007 Field Campaign .................................................................................................3-41 Table 4-1. Average Calculated Methane Flux (g/s) Value From Each Landfill Cell ..................4-1 Table 4-2. Average Concentrations of Total, Dimethyl, Monomethyl, and Elemental Mercury Measured at Each Site...................................................................................4-2 Table 5-1. Instrumentation Calibration Frequency and Description ............................................5-1 Table 5-2. DQI Goals for Instrumentation ....................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3. Accuracy of Concentration Measurements for Different R 2 Value ............................5-3 vii
Page 1 and 2: Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill G
Page 3 and 4: Foreword The U.S. Environmental Pro
Page 5 and 6: 3.1.3 Total Site Methane Emissions
Page 7: List of Tables Table 1-1. Target Co
Page 11 and 12: Table C-6. Methane Concentrations (
Page 13 and 14: List of Figures Figure 1-1. Map of
Page 15 and 16: Executive Summary Waste decompositi
Page 17 and 18: This page intentionally left blank.
Page 19 and 20: instrument (IMACC, Inc.). Figures 1
Page 21 and 22: Figure 1-3. Scanning Boreal GasFind
Page 23 and 24: wind direction data are collected n
Page 25 and 26: adsorption spectrometer. The analyz
Page 27 and 28: Table 1-2. Schedule of Work Perform
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2-2. Detail of measurement c
Page 31 and 32: corners of the cell, respectively.
Page 33 and 34: 2.2.3 Background Measurements Backg
Page 35 and 36: This page intentionally left blank.
Page 37 and 38: was aligned on the mirror targets i
Page 39 and 40: methane concentrations measured alo
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3-3 Summary of ORS measureme
Page 43 and 44: Table 3-5. Calculated methane flux
Page 45 and 46: Table 3-7. Calculated methane flux
Page 47 and 48: cell to the base. The following equ
Page 49 and 50: Table 3-9. Results of TO-15 analysi
Page 51 and 52: Table 3-10. Results of C1 to C6 and
Page 53 and 54: Table 3-14. Monomethyl Mercury Conc
Page 55 and 56: 3.2 Landfill Site #2 3.2.1 Control
Page 57 and 58: Table 3-17. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 59 and 60:
Table 3-19. Calculated Methane Flux
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.2 Bioreactor Cell 3.2.2.1 Febru
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Based on the calculations presented
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3-34. Results for C1 to C6 an
Page 73 and 74:
Table 3-38. Monomethyl Mercury Conc
Page 75 and 76:
3.3 Gas and Mercury Sampling Result
Page 77 and 78:
Site #1 with a level of 83 ppmv. Th
Page 79 and 80:
The surveys also found significant
Page 81 and 82:
Monomethyl mercury concentrations i
Page 83 and 84:
5.1 Equipment Calibration Chapter 5
Page 85 and 86:
The R 2 value was used to assess th
Page 87 and 88:
the measured path-integrated methan
Page 89 and 90:
5.2.7 DQI Check of Total Mercury Sa
Page 91 and 92:
Site #1 5.4 Site #2 77.9 Completene
Page 93 and 94:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 95 and 96:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agenc
Page 97 and 98:
d f e c b PDCs Y X a 2 12( y)( z) (
Page 99 and 100:
When the VRPM configuration consist
Page 101 and 102:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 103 and 104:
Table B-3. Distance, and Horizontal
Page 105 and 106:
Table B-7. Distance, and Horizontal
Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX C Path-Averaged Methane Co
Page 109 and 110:
Table C-3. Methane Concentrations (
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Table C-11. Methane Concentrations
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
show all

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?