16.08.2013 Views

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

Quantifying Uncontrolled Landfill Gas Emissions from Two Florida ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

calibration procedure differs <strong>from</strong> the procedure used to perform the annual calibration of the<br />

instruments.<br />

Additionally, a couple of reasonableness checks are performed in the field on the measured wind<br />

direction data. While data collection is occurring, the Field Team Leader compares wind<br />

direction measured with the heads to the forecasted wind direction for that particular day.<br />

The project team experienced some difficulties with collection of wind data on February 21 at<br />

Site #1. Due to problems with the data collection software, wind data were not collected on this<br />

day. However, this problem was corrected, and wind data were collected for the duration of the<br />

project. There was no indication that the problem experienced in collecting the wind data was<br />

caused by a malfunction of the instrumentation.<br />

5.2.5 DQI Check for Precision and Accuracy of Theodolite Measurements<br />

Calibration checks are not performed before each field campaign; however, the calibration date<br />

of the instrument is verified by referencing the calibration sticker. If the date indicates the<br />

instrument is in need of calibration, it should be returned to the manufacturer before use in the<br />

field. Before field deployment, ensure the battery packs are charged for this equipment. The<br />

following additional checks were made on April 19, 2006. The calibration of distance<br />

measurement was done at the ARCADIS facility using a tape measure. The actual distance was<br />

19.6 meters. The distances measured with the theodolite were 19.56 and 19.55 meters. The<br />

results indicate accuracy and precision fall well within the DQI goals. The calibration of angle<br />

measurement was also performed. The actual angle was 360°. The angles measured with the<br />

theodolite were 360°28’47” and 359°39’24”. The results indicate accuracy and precision fall<br />

well within the DQI goals, and completeness was 100 percent.<br />

Additionally, there are several internal checks in the theodolite software that prevent data<br />

collection <strong>from</strong> occurring if the instrument is not properly aligned on the object being measured,<br />

or if the instrument has not been balanced correctly. When this occurs, it is necessary to reinitialize<br />

the instrument to collect data.<br />

5.2.6 DQI Check for Lumex Mercury Analyzer<br />

The Lumex Mercury Analyzer DQIs of accuracy and precision are checked with a test cell,<br />

containing gas <strong>from</strong> the calibration standard. The cell is built into the instrument, and is accessed<br />

by setting the instrument to the “test” mode, and collecting measurements. If the measured value<br />

of the mercury vapor concentration in the test cell is within ±25 percent <strong>from</strong> that of the<br />

tabulated value and the standard deviation of the measurements is within ±25 percent, the<br />

accuracy and precision of the instrument are deemed acceptable.<br />

The Lumex mercury analyzer was zeroed using the internal carbon filter sample conditioner.<br />

Yearly calibrations are performed on this analyzer by factory personnel at Ohio Lumex. The<br />

precision criteria of ±25 percent established in the QAPP was met for samples collected at Site<br />

#1 (4.0% RSD), but not for samples collected at Site #2 (35.6% RSD).<br />

5-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!