18.08.2013 Views

PCWA-L 467.pdf - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

PCWA-L 467.pdf - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

PCWA-L 467.pdf - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4" STAGE MEASUREMENT<br />

ACCURACY OF BUBBLE..GAGE RECORDERS<br />

This section ofthe report discusses the inaccuracies inherent in any<br />

bubble-gage system for sensing stage; the discussion is not concerned<br />

with such sources of error as datum corrections, sediment deposition<br />

on the bubble orifice, and leaks in the system, which were discussed<br />

in the preceding sections. The principal sources oferror inherent in a<br />

bubble-gage recorder are variation in gas friction, variation in required<br />

bubble-feed rate with rate of increase in stage, and variation<br />

in weight of gas column with stage.<br />

Variation in gas friction.-Friction created by the flow of gas<br />

through the bubble tubing results in the pressure at the manometer<br />

being slightly higher than that at the orifice. If the bubble-feed rate<br />

could be kept co'nstant and temperature did not vary, the friction<br />

would remain constant and the accuracy of the gage would be unaffected,<br />

because the manometer is always set to agree with the watersurface<br />

elevation. However, changes in gas-feed rates cause variation<br />

in the friction of the gas flowing through the tube, and where long<br />

bubble tubes are used, the variation in friction can produce<br />

significant error in recorded gage height.<br />

Inaccuracies due to variation in gas friction can be eliminated by<br />

using two gas tubes-one to feed gas to the bubble orifice, the other to<br />

aet as a static pressure tube to transmit pressure from a point at or<br />

near the orifice back to the manometer.<br />

As a conservative criterion for determining when the use of dual<br />

tubing is desirable, it is suggested that variations in gas friction be<br />

limited to 0.01 ft (0"003 m). If, for a given length of orifice line, an<br />

error no greater than 0.01 ft results from a 100 percent increase in<br />

bubble rate, a single bubble tube will be satisfactory. Figure 36, based<br />

on laboratory tests using the standard U.S" Geological Survey bubble<br />

gage shows the relation between the length of bubble tubing and a<br />

100-percent variation in bubble rate for a gas-friction error ofO"Ol ft.<br />

To illustrate the use offigure 36, assume that a 100-percent variation<br />

in bubble rate represents a change from 40 bubbles per minute to 80<br />

bubbles per minute. The corresponding length of bubble tubing indicated<br />

by the diagram is 370 ft (113 m). Thus any lengtb of single<br />

tubing up to 370 ft could be used in tbis particular case without<br />

introducing a friction error in excess ofO"Ol ft. Ifmore than 370 ft of<br />

tubing is required at this particular site, and a gage-height error<br />

greater than 0.01 ft cannot be tolerated, two gas tubes should be used"<br />

When two tubes are used, they should bejoined at a T-connector, from<br />

whose vertical leg a single tube extends to the orifice. The<br />

T-connector should be located above the normal high-water elevation<br />

to prevent the entry of water into both legs of the system if pressure<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!