18.08.2013 Views

FERC Project No. 2079 - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

FERC Project No. 2079 - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

FERC Project No. 2079 - PCWA Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 KNOWN CRLF RECORDS<br />

4.2.1 Records Within the Study Area<br />

There is only one known CRLF record within the study area (Table 2 and Map 3). In<br />

June 2001, a single adult CRLF was observed in an ephemeral pool north of<br />

Pennsylvania Point, on the western end of Ralston Ridge (CNDDB 2007, PG&E 2004).<br />

Experts believe the frog was at this site during dispersal (Barry, pers. comm., 2007a).<br />

The site, which is on a right-of-way below a PG&E transmission line, was almost<br />

completely burned in the Ralston Ridge wildfire of 2006 and remains almost completely<br />

denuded. The pond, which appears to have been formed in a depression caused by<br />

ground disturbance and erosion resulting from logging operations, was completely dry in<br />

2007 during helicopter surveys completed for this Site Assessment. <strong>No</strong> frogs have<br />

been detected at the site since 2001 (Barry, pers. comm., 2007a).<br />

<strong>No</strong> CRLF were observed during ground surveys conducted in 2007 for this Site<br />

Assessment. In addition, there were no incidental sightings of CRLF recorded during<br />

numerous aquatic surveys conducted for the MFP in 2005 through 2007 as part of early<br />

relicensing studies.<br />

4.2.2 Records Outside the Study Area, but within the MFAR Watershed<br />

There are two additional CRLF records outside the study area, but within the MFAR<br />

watershed (Table 2 and Map 3):<br />

One CRLF museum specimen was found in the vicinity of Michigan Bluff, in<br />

1916, approximately 1 1/3 mile north of the study area.<br />

In 2006, a population of more than fifty CRLF was observed in ponds on private<br />

land at Michigan Bluff, just less than one mile north of the study area. All life<br />

stages were observed at the site (i.e., eggs, tadpoles, metamorphs, and adults),<br />

and the population is believed to be reproductive (Fesnock, pers. comm., 2007).<br />

4.3 CRLF HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS<br />

4.3.1 Upland Habitat<br />

The USFWS defines upland habitats broadly as those which “provide food and shelter<br />

sites for CRLF and assist in maintaining the integrity of aquatic sites by protecting them<br />

from disturbance and supporting the normal functions of the aquatic habitat” (USFWS<br />

2006). For example, upland habitats may be riparian areas immediately adjacent to<br />

aquatic breeding areas, or grasslands that contain seeps and springs (USFWS 2002).<br />

Adult CRLF may move from spawning pools into deeply shaded forest streams during<br />

the summer, and seek shelter in root masses and undercuts (Barry, pers. comm.,<br />

2007c). Due to the fact that CRLF in coastal California are known to make longdistance<br />

movements “without regard to topography, vegetation type, or riparian<br />

corridors” (USFWS 2002), any upland habitat that does not contain significant barriers<br />

to dispersal may potentially be used by CRLF. Barriers to dispersal defined by USFWS<br />

June 2008 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!