18.08.2013 Views

An analytic Green's function for a lined circular duct containing ...

An analytic Green's function for a lined circular duct containing ...

An analytic Green's function for a lined circular duct containing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

the series has converged in any plotted value of xax0, that is <strong>for</strong> 400pjx x0jb1, say, we used 400 radial<br />

modes, but the difference with less than that is only visible very near the source.<br />

In addition to this example <strong>for</strong> annular <strong>duct</strong>s we have compared our <strong>analytic</strong> Green’s <strong>function</strong> <strong>for</strong> hollow<br />

<strong>duct</strong>s with the ‘numerical’ Green’s <strong>function</strong> described by Alonso et al. [8]. We consider two cases, one with no<br />

mean flow, M ¼ 0, and one with a typical ‘intake’ Mach number of M ¼ 0:45. A typical non-dimensional<br />

frequency is o ¼ 28 <strong>for</strong> the flow case and we choose o ¼ 31:354 <strong>for</strong> the zero flow case so that the cut-off ratio<br />

of the highest hardwall cut-on mode is about the same <strong>for</strong> both cases. The impedance is Z1 ¼ 2:5 i0 in both<br />

cases. The number of cut-off modes included in the evaluation of the <strong>analytic</strong>al and numerical Green’s<br />

<strong>function</strong> evaluation corresponds to a cut-off ratio of 0.28 (i.e. the number of modes is set equal to the number<br />

of modes above that cut-off ratio that would exist if the <strong>duct</strong> was hard-walled) and only the positive modes in<br />

SPL at r=1<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

−20<br />

−40<br />

−0.04 −0.02 0<br />

x−x0 0.02 0.04<br />

Phase at r=1<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

−1<br />

−2<br />

−3<br />

28<br />

24<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

Total<br />

−0.04 −0.02 0<br />

x−x0 0.02 0.04<br />

Fig. 5. Axial variation of Green’s <strong>function</strong> amplitudes per azimuthal mode, SPL ¼ 20 logðjGmjÞ, and total field SPL (o ¼ 31:354, M ¼ 0,<br />

Z1 ¼ 2:5, r0 ¼ 1, cut-off ratio ¼ 0:28). Numerical and <strong>analytic</strong> results indistinguishable. Mode amplitude (a) and phase (b) on each side of<br />

source plane.<br />

±<br />

|Gm |, dB<br />

0<br />

−10<br />

S.W. Rienstra, B.J. Tester / Journal of Sound and Vibration 317 (2008) 994–1016 1005<br />

−20<br />

−30<br />

−40<br />

28<br />

24<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0 50 100<br />

Radial Mode Number<br />

150 200<br />

Phase (G± m ), radians<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

−1<br />

−2<br />

−3<br />

0 50 100<br />

Radial Mode Number<br />

150 200<br />

Fig. 6. <strong>An</strong>alytic Green’s <strong>function</strong> azimuthal mode amplitude variation with increasing radial mode number count m max; there is no finite<br />

asymptotic limit at the source position, as each azimuthal mode amplitude varies like logðm maxÞ (o ¼ 31:354, M ¼ 0, Z1 ¼ 2:5, r0 ¼ 1, <strong>for</strong><br />

min. cut-off ratio of 0.07). Left and right running modes: modulus (a) and phase (b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!