object the removal or destruction <strong>of</strong> the terrorist bases would appear to be justifiable under Article 51. 97 Chapter 4 considers self-defense; subsequent chapters consider other potential justifications.
NOTES 1. Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Foreign Assistance, Hearings on International Terrorism, <strong>state</strong>ment by Richard B. Lillich, 95th Cong.: 1st sess., 14 September 1977, 14-15, 18. See also Lillich, ‘Controlling Transnational Terrorism: The Relevance <strong>of</strong> International Law.” in American Society <strong>of</strong> International Law, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 72nd Annual Meeting, 27-29 April 1983 (Washington, D.C.,1985), 343; and Lillich. “International Terrorism,” in International Law Association (ILA), Report <strong>of</strong> the Fifty-Seventh Conference Held at Madrid (Great Britain: 1978), 139-40. 2. Judge Max Huber, Island <strong>of</strong> Palmas (United States v. The Netherlands). United Nations, Reports on International Arbitral Awards, vol.2 (1949), 839. 3. Chorzow factory, Permanent Court <strong>of</strong> International Justice (PCU), series A, no. 17 (1928), 29. See also Lt Comdr Michael Franklin Lohr, “Legal Analysis <strong>of</strong> U.S. Military Responses to State-Sponsored International Terrorism,” Naval Law Review 34 (1985): 9-10; and Max Sorensen, Manual for Public International Law (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1968), 533- 35. 4. See “Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations,” 26 June 1945, Statutes at Large, vol. 59: 1031; United States Treaty Series 993; Department <strong>of</strong> State, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, 1776-1949, compiled under the direction <strong>of</strong> Charles I. Bevans (hereinafter Bevans), vol. 3, Multilateral, 1931-1945, 1153; “Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations: Amendments to Articles 23, 27, and 67.” 31 August 1965, Treaties and Other International Acts Series (TIAS) 5857, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements (UST), vol. 16, pt. 2, 1134; United Nations Treaty Series (UNTS), Treaties and Other International Agreements Registered or Filed and Reported with the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, vol. 557 (1966), no. 8132, 143; “Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations: Amendments to Article 109,” 12 June 1969, TIAS 6529, UST, vol. 19, pt. 5, 5450; “Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations: Amendments to Article 61,” 24 September 1973, TIAS 1739, UST, vol. 24, pt. 2, 2225; see also Gerhard von Glahn, Law Among Nations, 3d ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1976), 177-80. 5. United Nations General Assembly, “Declaration on Principles <strong>of</strong> International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States,” 24 October 1970, Resolution 2526, Official Records (UN GAOR), 25th sess., supp. 28, A/8028 (1970), 121. 6. Maj William R. Farrell, USAF, “Terrorism Is…?” Naval War College Review 32, no. 3 (May-June 1980): 65. 7. See Oscar Schachter, ‘‘The Right <strong>of</strong> States to Use Armed Force,” Michigan Law Review 82 (April-May 1984): 1622. 8. See UN General Assembly, “Declaration on Inadmissibility <strong>of</strong> Intervention in the Domestic Affairs <strong>of</strong> States and the Protection <strong>of</strong> Their Political Independence and Sovereignty,” 21 December 1965, Resolution 2131, UN GAOR, 20th sess., supp. 14, A/60l4 (1965), 11; and von Glahn, 177-80. 9. See article 29, “Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Optional Protocol on Disputes,” 18 April 1961, TIAS 7502, UST, vol. 23, pt. 3, 3227; UNTS, vol. 500 (1964), no. 7310, 95. A US State Department publication notes: “It is internationally accepted that governments are responsible for the safety and welfare <strong>of</strong> persons within the borders <strong>of</strong> their nation.” Department <strong>of</strong> State, “International Terrorism: U.S. Policy on Taking Americans Hostage,” June 1986, 1.
- Page 2 and 3:
LEGITIMATE USE OF MILITARY FORCE AG
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS Page Disclaimer ii Forewor
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 7 USE OF MILITARY FORCE: TE
- Page 8 and 9:
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Lt Col Richard J.
- Page 10 and 11:
INTRODUCTION THE RELEVANCE OF INTER
- Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 7 summarizes the lessons le
- Page 14 and 15:
This Study, How Meaningful? States
- Page 16 and 17:
The international arena has seen so
- Page 18 and 19:
Combating terrorism accents this is
- Page 20 and 21:
7. Many scholars and jurists have f
- Page 22 and 23:
Jenkins, “Combatting Terrorism Be
- Page 24 and 25:
Thoughts toward an International Co
- Page 26 and 27:
29. See Vice President, Report on C
- Page 28 and 29:
CHAPTER 1 WHAT IS TERRORISM AND HOW
- Page 30 and 31:
If a general definition would be so
- Page 32 and 33:
Terrorism is the unlawful use or th
- Page 34 and 35:
International Terrorism: A Working
- Page 36 and 37:
there is evidence that President Id
- Page 38 and 39:
The Vice President’s Task Force o
- Page 40 and 41:
A Threat More Serious Than Numbers
- Page 42 and 43:
Diplomatic relations between countr
- Page 44 and 45:
And what has the challenge become?
- Page 46 and 47:
physically or by neutralizing their
- Page 48 and 49:
27. UN General Assembly, resolution
- Page 50 and 51: 44. L. C. Green of the University o
- Page 52 and 53: 65. Information provided by L. Cart
- Page 54 and 55: 105. See Stephen Sloan, Beating int
- Page 56 and 57: The law of armed conflict approach
- Page 58 and 59: But, as regards terrorism, the arme
- Page 60 and 61: 1. If the law of armed conflict is
- Page 62 and 63: Although both approaches, law enfor
- Page 64 and 65: crime involved. This initiative has
- Page 66 and 67: Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) wa
- Page 68 and 69: eaches, prosecution, and extraditio
- Page 70 and 71: the latter instance, no one claimed
- Page 72 and 73: international law establishing indi
- Page 74 and 75: Another issue is the choice and use
- Page 76 and 77: NOTES 1. Department of State, “Li
- Page 78 and 79: 28. Paul A. Tharp, Jr., “The Laws
- Page 80 and 81: 1919 a process has been under way t
- Page 82 and 83: 66. See Geneva Convention IV, artic
- Page 84 and 85: CHAPTER 3 STATES HAVE RESPONSIBILIT
- Page 86 and 87: International Terrorism and the Dut
- Page 88 and 89: government exercises within its ter
- Page 90 and 91: few states, although they do not vi
- Page 92 and 93: to establish the linkage required u
- Page 94 and 95: chapters 4-6 examine the second. Te
- Page 96 and 97: all Members shall refrain in their
- Page 98 and 99: valuable tools of self-help and of
- Page 102 and 103: 10. Jordan J. Paust, “Entebbe and
- Page 104 and 105: 34. See “Terrorism’s Grim Upsur
- Page 106 and 107: through activities that involve for
- Page 108 and 109: CHAPTER 4 INDIVIDUAL SELF-DEFENSE A
- Page 110 and 111: Strictly speaking, the right of ind
- Page 112 and 113: Clearly, however, states may not re
- Page 114 and 115: Although the degree of control that
- Page 116 and 117: The expansive school’s belief tha
- Page 118 and 119: What is the customary law on self-d
- Page 120 and 121: await the arrival on scene of an ar
- Page 122 and 123: Reasonable Response This element re
- Page 124 and 125: Summary and Transition Individual s
- Page 126 and 127: Security; Implications of Israel’
- Page 128 and 129: In response to this line of reasoni
- Page 130 and 131: American Society of International L
- Page 132 and 133: Brownlie, “Use of Force,” 231.
- Page 134 and 135: avoided if the focus is put properl
- Page 136 and 137: The danger of conceding to individu
- Page 138 and 139: Fifth, and finally, article 52, par
- Page 140 and 141: 12. See Rosalyn Higgins, “The Leg
- Page 142 and 143: CHAPTER 6 OTHER LEGAL ARGUMENTS TO
- Page 144 and 145: conditions necessary for invitation
- Page 146 and 147: The action must be taken for a puni
- Page 148 and 149: …Yet, essentially for reasons of
- Page 150 and 151:
The action must be necessitated by
- Page 152 and 153:
emained so once the operations were
- Page 154 and 155:
Perhaps the best ease for humanitar
- Page 156 and 157:
The state contemplating interventio
- Page 158 and 159:
Many have criticized the modern law
- Page 160 and 161:
NOTES 1. See J. E. S. Fawcett, ‘I
- Page 162 and 163:
27. Bowett writes, ‘‘Reprisals
- Page 164 and 165:
49. See Bowett, Self-Defence, 88. 5
- Page 166 and 167:
An International Journal 7, no. 2 (
- Page 168 and 169:
This study has considered each of t
- Page 170 and 171:
Piracy, which is limited to illegal
- Page 172 and 173:
NOTES 1. Joint Chiefs of Stall, Uni
- Page 174 and 175:
3. The action is taken to protect e
- Page 176 and 177:
Option 4: Collective Anticipatory S
- Page 178 and 179:
Option 8: Peacetime Reprisal Source
- Page 180 and 181:
8. The action is for a limited dura
- Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIX B UNITED NATIONS CHARTER (
- Page 184 and 185:
APPENDIX C STATUTE OF THE INTERNATI
- Page 186 and 187:
Crelinsten, Ronald D., Danielle Lab
- Page 188 and 189:
Almond, Harry E., Jr. “Using Law
- Page 190 and 191:
Clark, Roger S. “Humanitarian Int
- Page 192 and 193:
Harlow, Bruce, Lt Comdr, USN. “Th
- Page 194 and 195:
Livingstone, Neil C., and Terrell B
- Page 196 and 197:
Paust, Jordan 5. “Entebbe and Sel
- Page 198 and 199:
______. “Problems with the Applic
- Page 200 and 201:
Blum, Yehuda. State Terrorism and t
- Page 202 and 203:
“European Convention on the Suppr
- Page 204 and 205:
______. Arms Control and Disarmamen
- Page 206 and 207:
______. “Terrorist Attacks on US